[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3627377.3627406acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbdtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analysis of the influence of government intervention on consumers' preference for purchasing new energy vehicles

Published: 04 December 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Policy intervention on the sales end of new energy vehicles mainly includes two categories: purchase tax exemption and cash subsidy. In the purchase of new energy vehicles, purchase tax exemption and cash subsidies will have different degrees of impact on consumers' purchase preferences. This paper studies the influence of government intervention on consumers' purchase preference by using discrete choice experiment. The research results show that cash subsidies have a significant impact on consumers' willingness to buy new energy vehicles from the three indicators of payment willingness, consumer surplus and elasticity. Increasing the amount of purchase tax exemption and subsidy can increase consumer surplus and choice probability, and the combination policy of cash subsidies and purchase tax exemption is better than the implementation of a single policy. In addition, compared with the increase of purchase tax exemption, the increase of subsidies will generate more consumer surplus, and the growth rate of choice probability will be larger. Finally, the research results also show that different vehicle attributes such as wheelbase, driving cost, warranty period and endurance will significantly affect consumers' choice of new energy vehicles. The research results of this paper can provide some reference and inspiration for the government in the formulation of incentive policies and the automobile manufacturers in the improvement of vehicle performance.

References

[1]
Biao Zhou, Xizhao Zhou, Bin Li. Based on the analysis of the Shanghai consumer car sharing selection. Journal of Shanghai university of science and technology, 2014, 4 (01) : 97-102. 2014.01.020.
[2]
Kaixiang Xu, Haijiang Liu, Zhenhua Pan. Discrete selection model of vehicle body products for Customer Preference heterogeneity. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science),2018,46(05):667-672. (in Chinese)
[3]
Ruijin Huang, Gaofeng Gu. Research on Influencing Factors of electric vehicle purchase Intention based on Random Coefficient logit model. Transportation research, 2021, 7 (01) : 95-114. 9931.2021.01.011
[4]
Chengkun Wang, Donglin Chen, Jiang Wu. Car share scheduling strategy based on hybrid excitation mechanism research . Journal of industrial engineering and management, 2022, 27 (6) : 56-63. 5429.2022.06.008.
[5]
Shaohui Ma, Hui Tan, Yisheng Dai. Analysis of Consumer Characteristics and Preferences in new energy vehicle Market. Industrial Technical Economics,2013,32(11):113-121.
[6]
Yan Zhou, Yao Pan. Financial subsidies and tax relief: An analysis of new energy automobile industry policy from the perspective of transaction costs . Management world, 2019, 35 (10) : 133-149. 1235/f.2019.0137.
[7]
Zheyuan Liang, Wei Le. Impact of fiscal and taxation policies, technological progress and consumer preference on the development of new energy automobile industry. Financial and economic, 2022, No. 544 (11) : 56-65.
[8]
Dawei Wu, Lu Ma. Research on Influencing factors of travel time choice of new energy vehicles under the decline of subsidy policy. Comprehensive Transport,2022,44(09):30-38.
[9]
Heli Zhang, Weide Chun, Yan Ruzhen Research on closed-loop supply chain decision-making of new energy vehicles considering differentiated subsidies. Advances in Engineering Management Science and Technology,2023,42(02):67-74.
[10]
McCarthy, P.S.Market price and income elasticities of new vehicle demands. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1996, 78 (3),:543.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2109802
[11]
Helveston, John, Paul, Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? Measuring consumer preferences in the US and China. Transportation research, Part A. Policy and practice, 2015, 73A(Mar.):96-112.
[12]
Laura Roberson, John Paul Helveston.Not all subsidies are equal: measuring preferences for electric vehicle financial incentives. Environmental Research Letters. 2022,17(8):084003
[13]
Shengchuan Jiang, Yifan Sun, Yuchuan Du. The effect of congestion Degree on Public transportation mode choice Intention. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science Edition),2012,40(12):1831-1835.
[14]
Jianrong Liu, Xiaoni Hao. Research on influence parameters of subway congestion degree based on random coefficient Logit model. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 47 (04):61-75.
[15]
Ziegler A .Individual characteristics and stated preferences for alternative energy sources and propulsion technologies in vehicles: A Discrete Choice Analysis.CER-ETH Economics working paper series, 2012, 46(8):1372-1385.
[16]
Luce, D, Individual choice behavior, John Wiley and Sons, New York. 1959.
[17]
MarschakJ, Arrow K .Binary choice constraints on random utility indications. 1960.1960: 312–329.
[18]
McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. 1973.1974,:105–142.
[19]
Arne Risa Hole, Julie Riise Kolstad.Mixed logit estimation of willingness to pay distributions: a comparison of models in preference and WTP space using data from a health-related choice experiment .Empirical Economics. 2012(42):445-469.
[20]
Kenneth E. Train. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation.2009:134-147
[21]
Hensher D A, Greene W H .The mixedlogit model: the state of practice.Transportation, 2003, 30(2):133-176.

Index Terms

  1. Analysis of the influence of government intervention on consumers' preference for purchasing new energy vehicles

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICBDT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Big Data Technologies
    September 2023
    441 pages
    ISBN:9798400707667
    DOI:10.1145/3627377
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 December 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Consumer surplus
    2. New energy vehicles
    3. Random coefficient logit model
    4. Willingness to pay
    5. elasticity

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICBDT 2023

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 31
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media