[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3500931.3500997acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisaimsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dose information prediction for radiation treatment planning of nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on artificial neural networks

Published: 22 December 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Objective: An artificial neural network model is used to predict the dose information of radiation treatment planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 114 cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiation therapy in Fujian Cancer Hospital. The geometric spatial relationship features between the 25 organs at risk (OAR) and the target area were transformed from three-dimensional information to two-dimensional information by overlap volume histogram (OVH). 81 cases were used for training to obtain an dose prediction model based on artificial neural network with OVH information as input and radiation treatment planning dose information as output, 23 cases were used to test the accuracy of the prediction model. Results: For the 11 main OAR dosimetric parameters of nasopharyngeal cancer, the overall mean difference between predicted and actual values was -0.07±4.55 Gy for dose-related and -1.06±3.80% for volume-related, with a prediction accuracy of 90%. Conclusions: Dose prediction model based on artificial neural network can predict the dose information of radiation treatment planning for nasopharyngeal cancer accurately.

References

[1]
Bai P G, Weng X, Quan K R, et al. A knowledge-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning technique for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy[J]. Radiation Oncology, 2020, 15(1):188.
[2]
Moore K L, Brame R S, Low D A, et al. Quantitative metrics for assessing plan quality.[J]. Seminars in radiation oncology, 2012, 22(1):62--69.
[3]
Bohsung J, Gillis S, Arrans R, et al. IMRT treatment planning---A comparative inter-system and inter-centre planning exercise of the ESTRO QUASIMODO group[J]. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2005, 76(3):354--361.
[4]
Kazhdan M, Simari P, Mcnutt T, et al. A shape relationship descriptor for radiation therapy planning.[J]. Medical image computing and computer-assisted interv, 2009, 12(Pt 2):100--108.
[5]
Künzel L A, Leibfarth S, Dohm O S, et al. Automatic VMAT planning for post-operative prostate cancer cases using particle swarm optimization: A proof of concept study[J]. Physica Medica, 2020, 69:101--109.
[6]
Ruan D, Shao W, Demarco J, et al. Evolving treatment plan quality criteria from institution-specific experience.[J]. Medical physics, 2012, 39(5): 2708--2712.
[7]
Xia W L, Chen B, Huang P, et al. Quantitative comparison of volumetric rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning for hepatocellular carcinoma with and without flattening filters mode based on the plan quality measure (PQM)[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiology and Protection, 2018, 38(09):680--683.
[8]
Yaparpalvi R, Garg M K, Shen J, et al. Evaluating which plan quality metrics are appropriate for use in lung SBRT.[J]. The British journal of radiology, 2018, 91(1083):20170393.
[9]
Mayo C, Yorke E, Merchant T E. Radiation associated brainstem injury.[J]. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2010, 76(3 Suppl): S36-S41.
[10]
Moyed M, Yevgeniy V, Vitali M, et al. Radiation Dose-Volume Effects for Liver SBRT.[J]. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2018.
[11]
Kirkpatrick J P, Van Der Kogela J, Schultheiss T E. Radiation dose-volume effects in the spinal cord.[J]. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2010, 76(3 Suppl): S42-S49.
[12]
Pan C C, Kavanagh B D, Dawson LA, et al. Radiation-associated liver injury.[J]. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2010, 76(3 Suppl):S94-S100.
[13]
Deasy J O, Moiseenko V, Marks L, et al. Radiotherapy dose-volume effects on salivary gland function.[J]. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2010, 76(3 Suppl): S58-S63.
[14]
Zhu X F, Ge Y R, Li T R, et al. A planning quality evaluation tool for prostate adaptive IMRT based on machine learning.[J]. Medical physics, 2011, 38(2): 719--726.
[15]
Jiao S X, Chen L X, Zhu J H, et al. Prediction of dose-volume histograms in nasopharyngeal cancer IMRT using geometric and dosimetric information.[J]. Physics in medicine and biology, 2019, 64(23): 23NT04.
[16]
Chen X Y, Yang J M, Yi J L, et al. An artificial neural network model-based quality control method for VMAT planning in nasopharyngeal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiology and Protection, 2020(02):99--100

Index Terms

  1. Dose information prediction for radiation treatment planning of nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on artificial neural networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ISAIMS '21: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence for Medicine Sciences
    October 2021
    593 pages
    ISBN:9781450395588
    DOI:10.1145/3500931
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 December 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Artificial neural network
    2. Dose information prediction
    3. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    4. Radiation treatment planning

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ISAIMS 2021

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 53 of 112 submissions, 47%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 16
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media