[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3314221.3314622acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespldiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Verified compilation on a verified processor

Published: 08 June 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Developing technology for building verified stacks, i.e., computer systems with comprehensive proofs of correctness, is one way the science of programming languages furthers the computing discipline. While there have been successful projects verifying complex, realistic system components, including compilers (software) and processors (hardware), to date these verification efforts have not been compatible to the point of enabling a single end-to-end correctness theorem about running a verified compiler on a verified processor.
In this paper we show how to extend the trustworthy development methodology of the CakeML project, including its verified compiler, with a connection to verified hardware. Our hardware target is Silver, a verified proof-of-concept processor that we introduce here. The result is an approach to producing verified stacks that scales to proving correctness, at the hardware level, of the execution of realistic software including compilers and proof checkers. Alongside our hardware-level theorems, we demonstrate feasibility by hosting and running our verified artefacts on an FPGA board.

References

[1]
2018. IEEE Standard for System Verilog-Unified Hardware Design, Specification, and Verification Language. IEEE Std 1800-2017 (Revision of IEEE Std 1800-2012) (2018).
[2]
Eyad Alkassar, Mark A. Hillebrand, Dirk Leinenbach, Norbert W. Schirmer, and Artem Starostin. 2008. The Verisoft Approach to Systems Verification. In Verified Software: Theories, Tools, Experiments (VSTTE).
[3]
Andrew W. Appel, Lennart Beringer, Adam Chlipala, Benjamin C. Pierce, Zhong Shao, Stephanie Weirich, and Steve Zdancewic. 2017. Position paper: the science of deep specification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 375, 2104 (2017).
[4]
William R. Bevier, Warren A. Hunt, J Strother Moore, and William D. Young. 1989. An approach to systems verification. Journal of Automated Reasoning 5, 4 (1989).
[5]
Sven Beyer, Christian Jacobi, Daniel Kroening, and Dirk Leinenbach. 2002. Correct Hardware by Synthesis from PVS. Technical Report. http://www-wjp.cs.uni-sb.de/publikationen/BJKL02.pdf.
[6]
Sven Beyer, Christian Jacobi, Daniel Kröning, Dirk Leinenbach, and Wolfgang J. Paul. 2006. Putting it all together - Formal verification of the VAMP. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer (STTT) 8, 4 (2006).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Modular Verification of Secure and Leakage-Free Systems: From Application Specification to Circuit-Level ImplementationProceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 30th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles10.1145/3694715.3695956(655-672)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Foundational Integration Verification of a Cryptographic ServerProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36564468:PLDI(1704-1729)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Live Verification in an Interactive Proof AssistantProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36564398:PLDI(1535-1558)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
PLDI 2019: Proceedings of the 40th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation
June 2019
1162 pages
ISBN:9781450367127
DOI:10.1145/3314221
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 June 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Badges

Author Tags

  1. compiler verification
  2. hardware verification
  3. program verification
  4. verified stack

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

PLDI '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 406 of 2,067 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)62
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Modular Verification of Secure and Leakage-Free Systems: From Application Specification to Circuit-Level ImplementationProceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 30th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles10.1145/3694715.3695956(655-672)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Foundational Integration Verification of a Cryptographic ServerProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36564468:PLDI(1704-1729)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Live Verification in an Interactive Proof AssistantProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36564398:PLDI(1535-1558)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • (2023)The K2 Architecture for Trustworthy Hardware Security ModulesProceedings of the 1st Workshop on Kernel Isolation, Safety and Verification10.1145/3625275.3625402(26-32)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Formally Verified Native Code Generation in an Effectful JIT: Turning the CompCert Backend into a Formally Verified JIT CompilerProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/35712027:POPL(249-277)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Verified Propagation Redundancy and Compositional UNSAT Checking in CakeMLInternational Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer10.1007/s10009-022-00690-y25:2(167-184)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2023
  • (2021)Touring the MetaCoq Project (Invited Paper)Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science10.4204/EPTCS.337.2337(13-29)Online publication date: 16-Jul-2021
  • (2021)Formal verification of high-level synthesisProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/34854945:OOPSLA(1-30)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2021
  • (2021)HeteroFuzz: fuzz testing to detect platform dependent divergence for heterogeneous applicationsProceedings of the 29th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering10.1145/3468264.3468610(242-254)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2021
  • (2021)Reticle: a virtual machine for programming modern FPGAsProceedings of the 42nd ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation10.1145/3453483.3454075(756-771)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media