[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
other

An instrument to assess self-efficacy in introductory algorithms courses

Published: 30 January 2018 Publication History
First page of PDF

References

[1]
A. R. Artino Jr. Academic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice. Perspectives in Medical Education, 1:76 85, 2012.
[2]
A. Bandura. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2):191 215, 1977.
[3]
S. Beyer, K. Rynes, J. Perrault, K. Hay, and S. Haller. Gender differences in computer science students. In S. Grissom, D. Knox, D. Joyce, and W. Dann, editors, Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 49 53. ACM Press, 2003.
[4]
A. E. Black and E. L. Deci. The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6):740 756, Nov, 2000.
[5]
J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman. Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. British Medical Journal, 314:572, Feb. 1997.
[6]
D. T. Campbell and D. W. Fiske. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2):81 105, Mar. 1959.
[7]
A. R. Carberry, H.-S. Lee, and M. W. Ohland. Measuring engineering design self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1):71 79, Jan. 2010.
[8]
J. M. Cohoon. Gendered experiences of computing graduate programs. In I. Russell, S. M. Haller, J. D. Dougherty, and S. H. Rodger, editors, Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 546 550. ACM Press, 2007.
[9]
H. Danielsiek and J. Vahrenhold. Stay on these roads: Potential factors indicating students' performance in a CS2 course. In C. Alphonce, J. Tims, M. E. Caspersen, and S. Edwards, editors, Proceedings of the 47th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SICGSE 2016), pages 12 17. ACM Press, 2016.
[10]
E. L. Deci, H. Eghari, B. C. Patrick, and D. R. Leone. Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1):119 142, Dec. 1994.
[11]
P. Denny, A. Luxton-Reilly, J. Hamer, D. B. Dahlstrom, and H. C. Purchase. Self-predicted and actual performance in an introductory programming course. In R. Ayfer, J. Impagliazzo, and C. Laxer, editors, Proceedings of the 15th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2010, pages 118 122, New York City, 2010. ACM.
[12]
D. M. Dowling. The Development of a Mathematics Confidence Scale and Its Application in the Study of Confidence in Women College Students. PhD thesis, Ohio State University, 1978.
[13]
P.H. Dunham. Mathematical Confidence and Performance in Technology-Enhanced Precalculus: Gender-Related Differences. PhD thesis, Ohio State University, 1990.
[14]
C. S. Dweck. Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA, 1999.
[15]
C. A. Farrington, M. Roderick, E. Allensworth, J. Nagaoka, T. S. Keyes, D. W. Johnson, and N. O. Beechum. Teaching adolescents to become learners. The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review. University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research, Chicago, 2012.
[16]
M. P. Fay and M. A. Proschan. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney or t-test? On assumptions for hypothesis testing and multiple interpretations of decision rules. Statistics Surveys, 4:1 39, 2010.
[17]
J. Gal-Ezer and E. Zur. The efficiency of algorithms misconceptions. Computers & Education, 42:215 226, 2004.
[18]
D. Ginat and Y. Blau. Multiple levels of abstraction in algorithmic problem solving. In M. E. Caspersen, S. Edwards, T. Barnes, and D. D. Garcia, editors, Proceedings of the 48th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SICGSE 2017), pages 237 242. ACM Press, 2017.
[19]
P. Gray. Declining student resilience: A serious problem for colleges. Psychology Today, 2015. Blog post (Sep. 22): https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201509/declining-student-resilience-serious-problem-colleges.
[20]
G. Hackett and N. E. Betz. Mathematics self-efficacy expectations, math performance, and the consideration of math-related majors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Mar. 1982. 42 pages.
[21]
M. Hertz. What do CS1 and CS2 mean?: Investigating differences in the early courses. In T. Cortina and E. Walker, editors, Proceedings of the 41st SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2010), pages 199 203. ACM Press, 2010.
[22]
H. F. Kaiser and J. Rice. Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1):111 117, Sept. 1974.
[23]
P. Kinnunen and B. Simon. Experiencing programming assignments in CS1: the emotional toll. In M. E. Caspersen, M. J. Clancy, and K. Sanders, editors, Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER 2010), pages 77 86. ACM Press, 2010.
[24]
P. Kinnunen and B. Simon. CS majors' self-efficacy perceptions in CS1: Results in light of social cognitive theory. In M. E. Caspersen, A. Clear, and K. Sanders. editors, Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER 2011), pages 19 26. ACM Press, 2011.
[25]
R. W. Lent and S. D. Brown. Towards a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1):79 122, 1994.
[26]
A. Lishinski, A. Yadav, J. Good, and R. Enbody. Learning to program: Gender differences and interactive effects of students' motivation, goals, and self-efficacy on performance. In J. Sheard, J. Tenenberg, D. Chinn, and B. Dorn, editors, Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER 2016), pages 221 220. ACM Press, 2016.
[27]
J. L. Maples, L. Guan, N. T. Carter, and J. D. Miller. A test of the international personality item pool representation of the revised NEO personality inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 26(4):1070 1084, Dec. 2014.
[28]
L. Murphy and L. Thomas. Dangers of a fixed mindset: Implications of self-theories research for computer science education. In J. Amillo, C. Laxer, E. M. Ruiz, and A. Young, editors, Proceedings of the 13th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2008, pages 271 275, New York City, 2008. ACM.
[29]
M. C. O'Connor and S. V. Paunonen. Big five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5):971 990, 2007.
[30]
F. Pajares and M. D. Miller. Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2):193 203, 1994.
[31]
F. Pajares and D. H. Schunk. Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding and S. Rayner, editors, Perception, pages 239 266. Ablex Publishing, London, 2001.
[32]
J. Perrenet and E. Kaasenbrood. Levels of abstraction in students' understanding of the concept of algorithm: the qualitative perspective. In R. Davoli, M. Goldweber, and P. Salomoni, editors, Proceedings of the 11th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2006, pages 270 274, New York City, 2006. ACM.
[33]
J. P. Peter. Construct validity: A review of basic issues and marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(2):133 145, May 1981.
[34]
A. Quade. Development and validation of a computer science self-efficacy scale for CS0 courses and the group analysis of CS0 student self-efficacy. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology: Computers and Communications (ITCCi'03), pages 60 64. IEEE Computer Society, 2003.
[35]
V. Ramalingam, D. LaBelle, and S. Wiedenbeck. Self-efficacy and mental models in learning to program. In R. D. Boyle, M. Clark, and A. Kumar, editors, Proceedings of the 9th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2004, pages 171 175, New York City, 2004. ACM.
[36]
V. Ramalingam and S. Wiedenbeck. Development and validation of scores on a computer programming self-efficacy scale and groups analyses of novice programmer self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(4):367 381, Dec. 1998.
[37]
T. M. Rawson, D. P. Hoyt, and D. J. Teeter. Identifying "comparable" institutions. Research in Higher Education, 18(3):299 310, 1983.
[38]
B. Simon, B. Hanks, L. Murphy, S. Fitzgerald, R. McCauley, L. Thomas, and C. Zander. Saying isn't necessarily believing: influencing self-theories in computing. In M. E. Caspersen, R. Lister, and M. Clancy, editors, Proceedings of the Fourth International Computing Education Research Workshop, ICER 2008, pages 173 184, New York City, 2008. ACM.
[39]
J. Vahrenhold and W. Paul. Developing and validating test items for first-year computer science courses. Computer Science Education, 24(4):304 333, Dec. 2014.
[40]
R. Wilcon. An epidemic of anguish: Overwhelmed by demand for mental-health care, colleges face conflicts in choosing how to respond. Higher Education Chronicle, 2015. Aug. 21, http://chronicle.com/article/An-Epidemic-of-Anguish/232721.
[41]
B.C. Wilson and S. Shrock. Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: A study of twelve factors. In H. M. Walker, R. A. McCauley, J. L. Gersting, and I. Russell, editors, Proceedings of the 32nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Compufer Science Education, pages 184 188. ACM Press, 2001.
[42]
D. Zingaro. Peer instruction contributes to self-efficacy in CS1. In J. D. Dougherty, K. Nagel, A. Decker, and K. Eiselt, editors, Proceedings of the 45th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SICGSE 2014), pages 373 378. ACM Press, 2014.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Identifying Factors That Influence Engineering Students' Outcome Expectancy and Learning Self-Efficacy in a Flipped CS1 Course2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings10.18260/1-2--43428Online publication date: Jun-2023
  • (2023)Towards a Validated Self-Efficacy Scale for Data ManagementProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569767(186-192)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
  • (2022)Pre-Service Computer Science Teachers’ Computational Thinking Attitudes and Performance on Python TasksProceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/3564721.3565963(1-2)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2022
  • Show More Cited By
  1. An instrument to assess self-efficacy in introductory algorithms courses

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Inroads
    ACM Inroads  Volume 9, Issue 1
    March 2018
    62 pages
    ISSN:2153-2184
    EISSN:2153-2192
    DOI:10.1145/3184058
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 30 January 2018
    Published in INROADS Volume 9, Issue 1

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Other
    • Popular
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)29
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Identifying Factors That Influence Engineering Students' Outcome Expectancy and Learning Self-Efficacy in a Flipped CS1 Course2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings10.18260/1-2--43428Online publication date: Jun-2023
    • (2023)Towards a Validated Self-Efficacy Scale for Data ManagementProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569767(186-192)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
    • (2022)Pre-Service Computer Science Teachers’ Computational Thinking Attitudes and Performance on Python TasksProceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/3564721.3565963(1-2)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Integration of Practical Computing Skills and Co-curricular Activities in the CurriculumProceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 110.1145/3502718.3524802(61-67)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2022
    • (2022)A Decade of Demographics in Computing Education Research: A Critical Review of Trends in Collection, Reporting, and UseProceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3501385.3543967(323-343)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2022
    • (2021)Exploring Indicators to Promote Pre-service Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Programming TasksProceedings of the 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/3488042.3489965(1-3)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2021
    • (2021)Investigating Teacher’s Empathy and Its Impact on Pre-Service Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Programming TasksProceedings of the 16th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education10.1145/3481312.3481332(1-2)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Digital Edition

    View this article in digital edition.

    Digital Edition

    Magazine Site

    View this article on the magazine site (external)

    Magazine Site

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media