[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3159450.3159504acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Including Coding Questions in Video Quizzes for a Flipped CS1

Published: 21 February 2018 Publication History

Abstract

In an effort to improve student performance in a flipped classroom environment, this paper explores the impact of including auto-graded coding questions in gate check quizzes associated with videos for a flipped CS1 course. Previous work showed that having students complete multiple choice questions that were intended to verify that they had done the preparation work did not have a statistically significant impact on outcomes as measured through written quizzes and exams. In an attempt to engage higher-level processing of learned information, this work builds on top of that by adding questions that require students to write short segments of code for most of the quizzes in addition to doing some multiple choice questions. We found that students who were given these coding video quizzes performed better on written assessments, especially for the final exam.

References

[1]
N. E. Adams. Blooms taxonomy of learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association, pages 152--153, Jul 2015.
[2]
A. Amresh, A. R. Carberry, and J. Femiani. Evaluating the effectiveness of flipped classrooms for teaching cs1. In 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pages 733--735, Oct 2013.
[3]
W. G. Bowen, M. M. Chingos, K. A. Lack, and T. I. Nygren. Interactive learning online at public universities: evidence from a six-campus randomized trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1):94--111, 2014.
[4]
S. Cummins, A. R. Beresford, and A. Rice. Investigating engagement with in-video quiz questions in a programming course. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(1):57--66, 2016.
[5]
T. Economides. The state of the art in educational technology. In Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), 2013 IEEE, pages 285--287, Oct 2013.
[6]
J. Enfield. Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at csun. TechTrends, 57(6):14--27, 2013.
[7]
Y. Hao. Exploring undergraduates' perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 59:82--92, 2016.
[8]
D. Horton and M. Craig. Drop, fail, pass, continue: Persistence in cs1 and beyond in traditional and inverted delivery. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '15, pages 235--240, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM.
[9]
S. C. Kong. Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78:160--173, 2014.
[10]
L. Lacher and M. C. Lewis. The value of video quizzes in a computer science flipped classroom: An empirical study. In The 2014 International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science & Computer Engineering, pages 94--100. CSREA Press, 2014.
[11]
L. L. Lacher, A. Jiang, Y. Zhang, and M. C. Lewis. Aptitude and previous experience in cs1 classes. In Int'l Conf. Frontiers in Education: CS and CE | FECS'17, pages 87--95, 2017.
[12]
L. L. Lacher and M. C. Lewis. The effectiveness of video quizzes in a flipped class. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 224--228. ACM, 2015.
[13]
M. C. Lewis. Instructional youtube videos. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEvjiWkK2BoIH819T-buioQ.
[14]
M. C. Lewis. Introduction to the art of programming using scala, 2012.
[15]
G. S. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and K. E. Cook. Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4):430--435, 2013.
[16]
U. of Kent. University of Kent. https://www.kent.ac.uk/careers/tests/computer-test.htm.
[17]
C. R. Phillips and J. E. Trainor. Millennial students and the flipped classroom. Journal of Business and Educational Leadership, 5(1):102, 2014.
[18]
Sophia.org. Growth in flipped learning. https://www.sophia.org/flipped-classroom-survey, 2014. {Online; accessed 22-August-2016}.
[19]
K. F. Stanger-Hall. Multiple-choice exams: An obstacle for higher-level thinking in introductory science classes. In CBE life sciences education, 2012.
[20]
J. F. Strayer. How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2):171--193, 2012.
[21]
D. Zhang, L. Zhou, R. Briggs, and J. Nunamaker. Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information and Management, 43(1):15--27, 1 2006.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Video Versus Source Code Lab SolutionsProceedings of the 8th Conference on Computing Education Practice10.1145/3633053.3633056(41-44)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Choosing a Didactic Basis for an Instructional Video: What Are the Implications For Novice Programmers?Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3587102.3588795(450-456)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023
  • (2022)To Do or not to Do Previous Homework in Computer Education2022 11th International Conference on Information Communication and Applications (ICICA)10.1109/ICICA56942.2022.00013(34-39)Online publication date: Jun-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCSE '18: Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
February 2018
1174 pages
ISBN:9781450351034
DOI:10.1145/3159450
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 February 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. CS1
  2. active learning
  3. assessments
  4. blended learning
  5. flipped classroom
  6. flipped learning
  7. inverted classroom
  8. novice programming
  9. programming
  10. video quizzes

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGCSE '18
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGCSE '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 161 of 459 submissions, 35%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE TS 2025
The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
February 26 - March 1, 2025
Pittsburgh , PA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Video Versus Source Code Lab SolutionsProceedings of the 8th Conference on Computing Education Practice10.1145/3633053.3633056(41-44)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Choosing a Didactic Basis for an Instructional Video: What Are the Implications For Novice Programmers?Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3587102.3588795(450-456)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023
  • (2022)To Do or not to Do Previous Homework in Computer Education2022 11th International Conference on Information Communication and Applications (ICICA)10.1109/ICICA56942.2022.00013(34-39)Online publication date: Jun-2022
  • (2021)Additional eLearning Considerations Around the Instructor's Philosophical Belief SystemseLearning Engagement in a Transformative Social Learning Environment10.4018/978-1-7998-6956-6.ch006(114-134)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)Flipped Classrooms for Introductory Computer Programming CoursesInternational Journal of Information and Education Technology10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.4.150811:4(178-183)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)Strategies on Teaching Introducing to Programming in Higher EducationTrends and Applications in Information Systems and Technologies10.1007/978-3-030-72660-7_14(133-150)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2021
  • (2019)Interactive Preparatory Work in a Flipped Programming CourseProceedings of the ACM Conference on Global Computing Education10.1145/3300115.3309520(229-235)Online publication date: 9-May-2019
  • (2019)Captioning Online Course VideosProceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3287324.3287347(511-517)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2019

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media