[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2815782.2815810acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Contributor Motivation in Online Knowledge Sharing Communities with Reputation Management Systems

Published: 28 September 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This paper explores what motivates people to contribute knowledge in online communities and the effects that reputation management systems have on this motivation. An interpretivist case study of Stack Overflow was carried out. Seven categories of motivation were identified from the literature; fun, ideology, reputation, reciprocity, efficacy, attachment, and structural capital. Self-determination theory and the notion of knowledge as a public versus a private good were used as theoretical lenses to understand contributor motivation under each of these categories. Findings from the case identified important emergent themes such as the need for involvement in a community prior to contribution, and the importance of considering factors that discourage contribution in addition to those that encourage contribution when researching the contributor phenomenon.
The paper argues that self-determination theory is a useful theoretical lens to apply to the study of contributor motivation, and whilst the notion of knowledge as a public versus a private good is useful to understanding some of the motivations found in the literature, increased complexity of knowledge sharing online communities reduces the utility of this theoretical lens, as evidenced by the case of Stack Overflow.

References

[1]
Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., & Leskovec, J. (2012, August). Discovering value from community activity on focused question answering sites: a case study of stack overflow. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 850--858). ACM.
[2]
Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social Science Research: principles, methods, and practices, Textbooks Collection, Book 3.
[3]
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77--101.
[4]
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology, 416.
[5]
Kiesler, S., Kraut, R. E., Resnick, P., & Kittur, A. (2012). Regulating behavior in online communities. Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[6]
Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (1996). Managing the virtual commons. Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives, 109--128.
[7]
Kollock, P. (1999). The economies of online cooperation. Communities in cyberspace, 220--242.
[8]
Nov, O. (2007). What motivates wikipedians?. Communications of the ACM, 50(11), 60--64.
[9]
Oh, S. (2012). The characteristics and motivations of health answerers for sharing information, knowledge, and experiences in online environments. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 63: 543--557.
[10]
Parameswaran, M., & Whinston, A. B. (2007). Research Issues in Social Computing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(6).
[11]
Phang, C. W., Kankanhalli, A., & Sabherwal, R. (2009). Usability and Sociability in Online Communities: A Comparative Study of Knowledge Seeking and Contribution. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(10).
[12]
Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., & Andrews, D. (2004). The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2), 201--223.
[13]
Resnick, P., Kuwabara, K., Zeckhauser, R., & Friedman, E. (2000). Reputation systems. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 45--48.
[14]
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54--67.
[15]
StackOverflow. (2014). Help Centre. URL: http://stackoverflow.com/help {accessed: 15 May 2014}.
[16]
Tang, Q., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2012). Content contribution for revenue sharing and reputation in social media: A dynamic structural model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(2), 41--76.
[17]
Von Krogh, G., Haefliger, S., Spaeth, S., & Wallin, M. W. (2012). Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and Social Practice in Open Source Software Development. MIS Quarterly, 36(2).
[18]
Wasko, M., & Faraj, S. (2000). "It is what one does": Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2), 155--173.
[19]
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS quarterly, 35--57.
[20]
Wikipedia. (2014). Wikipedia:About. URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About {accessed: 24 April 2014}.
[21]
Xia, M., Huang, Y., Duan, W., & Whinston, A. B. (2012). To Continue Sharing or Not to Continue Sharing?--An Empirical Analysis of User Decision in Peer-to-Peer Sharing Networks. Information Systems Research, 23(1), 247--259.
[22]
YouTube. (2014). Statistics. URL: http://www.youtube.com/yt/press/statistics.html {accessed: 24 April 2014}.
[23]
Zacharia, G., & Maes, P. (2000). Trust management through reputation Mechanisms. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 14(9), 881--907.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Unveiling the Dynamics of Extrinsic Motivations in Shaping Future Experts’ Contributions to Developer Q&A CommunitiesIET Software10.1049/2024/83548622024(1-15)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Understanding Developers' Contribution Motivation in Stack Overflow: A Systematic Review2023 30th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)10.1109/APSEC60848.2023.00046(359-368)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
  • (2022)From Receivers to Givers: Understanding Practice of Reciprocity in an Online Support CommunityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35129386:CSCW1(1-17)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SAICSIT '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Research Conference on South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists
September 2015
423 pages
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 September 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Contributor Motivation
  2. Online Knowledge Sharing Communities
  3. Public versus Private Goods
  4. Reputation Management System
  5. Self Determination Theory

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

SAICSIT '15

Acceptance Rates

SAICSIT '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 43 of 119 submissions, 36%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 187 of 439 submissions, 43%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 23 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Unveiling the Dynamics of Extrinsic Motivations in Shaping Future Experts’ Contributions to Developer Q&A CommunitiesIET Software10.1049/2024/83548622024(1-15)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Understanding Developers' Contribution Motivation in Stack Overflow: A Systematic Review2023 30th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)10.1109/APSEC60848.2023.00046(359-368)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
  • (2022)From Receivers to Givers: Understanding Practice of Reciprocity in an Online Support CommunityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35129386:CSCW1(1-17)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2022
  • (2021)Motivation under Gamification: An Empirical Study of Developers' Motivations and Contributions in Stack OverflowIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2021.3130088(1-1)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)Enhancing diffusion of consumer innovations on knowledge sharing platformsAsian Journal of Technology Innovation10.1080/19761597.2021.188685930:2(409-427)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2021
  • (2019)Are You Talking about Software Product Lines?Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Variability Modelling of Software-Intensive Systems10.1145/3302333.3302348(1-9)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2019
  • (2017)Empirical studies in question-answering systemsProceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry10.1109/CESI.2017.6(23-26)Online publication date: 20-May-2017

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media