[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2449396.2449413acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Directing exploratory search: reinforcement learning from user interactions with keywords

Published: 19 March 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Techniques for both exploratory and known item search tend to direct only to more specific subtopics or individual documents, as opposed to allowing directing the exploration of the information space. We present an interactive information retrieval system that combines Reinforcement Learning techniques along with a novel user interface design to allow active engagement of users in directing the search. Users can directly manipulate document features (keywords) to indicate their interests and Reinforcement Learning is used to model the user by allowing the system to trade off between exploration and exploitation. This gives users the opportunity to more effectively direct their search nearer, further and following a direction. A task-based user study conducted with 20 participants comparing our system to a traditional query-based baseline indicates that our system significantly improves the effectiveness of information retrieval by providing access to more relevant and novel information without having to spend more time acquiring the information.

Supplementary Material

JPG File (iui0264-file3.jpg)
suppl.mov (iui0264-file3.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Alonso, O., Baeza-Yates, R., and Gertz, M. Exploratory search using timelines. In SIGCHI 2007 Workshop on Exploratory Search and HCI Workshop, no. 1 (2007).
[2]
Auer, P. Using confidence bounds for exploitation-exploration trade-offs. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (2002), 397--422.
[3]
Auer, P., Hussain, Z., Kaski, S., A. Klami, J. Kujala, Laaksonen, J., Leung, A., Pasupa, K., and Shawe-Taylor, J. Pinview: Implicit feedback in content-based image retrieval. In JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings: Workshop on Application of Pattern Analysis, vol. 11 (2010), 51--57.
[4]
Balabanović, M. Exploring versus exploiting when learning user models for text recommendation. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 8 (1998), 71--102.
[5]
Baldonado, M., and Winograd, T. Sensemaker: an information-exploration interface supporting the contextual evolution of a user's interests. In Proc. of SIGCHI (1997), 11--18.
[6]
Brooke, J. Sus - a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry 189 (1996), 194.
[7]
Chapelle, O., and Li, L. An empirical evaluation of thompson sampling. In Proc. of NIPS, vol. 25 (2011).
[8]
Chau, D., Kittur, A., Hong, J., and Faloutsos, C. Apolo: making sense of large network data by combining rich user interaction and machine learning. In Proc. of SIGCHI (2011), 167--176.
[9]
Głowacka, D., and Shawe-Taylor, J. Content-based image retrieval with multinomial relevance feedback. In JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings: 2nd Asian Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 13 (2010), 111--125.
[10]
Havre, S., Hetzler, E., Perrine, K., Jurrus, E., and Miller, N. Interactive visualization of multiple query results. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (2001), 105.
[11]
Hutchins, E. L., Hollan, J. D., and Norman, D. A. Direct manipulation interfaces. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, 4 (Dec. 1985), 311--338.
[12]
Joachims, T., Freitag, D., and Mitchell, T. Webwatcher: A tour guide for the world wide web. In Proc. of IJCAI (1997).
[13]
Käki, M. Findex: search result categories help users when document ranking fails. In Proc. of SIGCHI (2005), 131--140.
[14]
Kelly, D., and Fu, X. Elicitation of term relevance feedback: an investigation of term source and context. In Proc. of SIGIR (2006), 453--460.
[15]
Kules, B., Wilson, M., Schraefel, M., and Shneiderman, B. From keyword search to exploration: How result visualization aids discovery on the web. Human-Computer Interaction Lab Technical Report HCIL-2008-06, University of Maryland (2008).
[16]
Leide, J., Cole, C., Beheshti, J., Large, A., and Lin, Y. Task-based information retrieval: Structuring undergraduate history essays for better course evaluation using essay-type visualizations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, 9 (2007), 1227--1241.
[17]
Li, L., Chu, W., Langford, J., and Schapire, R. A contextual-bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation. In Proc. of WWW (2010).
[18]
Marchionini, G. Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Commun. ACM 49, 4 (Apr. 2006), 41--46.
[19]
Matejka, J., Grossman, T., and Fitzmaurice, G. Citeology: visualizing paper genealogy. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (2012), 181--190.
[20]
Pandey, S., Agarwal, D., Chakrabarti, D., and Josifovski, V. Bandits for taxonomies: A modelbased approach. In Proc. of ICDM (2007).
[21]
Pu, P., Chen, L., and Hu, R. A user-centric evaluation framework for recommender systems. In Proc. of RecSys (2011), 157--164.
[22]
Radlinski, F., Kleinberg, R., and Joachims, T. Learning diverse rankings with multi-armed bandits. In Proc. of ICML (2008), 784--791.
[23]
Seo, Y., and Zhang, B. A reinforcement learning agent for personalized information filtering. In Proc. of IUI (2000), 248--251.
[24]
Spärck-Jones, K. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of Documentation 28, 1 (1972), 11--21.
[25]
Spink, A., Wolfram, D., Jansen, M. B. J., and Saracevic, T. Searching the web: The public and their queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52 (2001), 226--234.
[26]
Teevan, J., Alvarado, C., Ackerman, M. S., and Karger, D. R. The perfect search engine is not enough: a study of orienteering behavior in directed search. In Proc. of SIGCHI (2004), 415--422.
[27]
Terveen, L., Hill, W., and Amento, B. Constructing, organizing, and visualizing collections of topically related web resources. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 6, 1 (1999), 67--94.
[28]
Tombros, A., and Sanderson, M. Advantages of query biased summaries in information retrieval. In Proc. of SIGIR (1998), 2--10.
[29]
White, R. W., Bennett, P. N., and Dumais, S. T. Predicting short-term interests using activity-based search context. In Proc. of CIKM (2010).
[30]
Yee, K.-P., Swearingen, K., Li, K., and Hearst, M. Faceted metadata for image search and browsing. In Proc. of SIGCHI (2003), 401--408.
[31]
Yue, Y., and Joachims, T. Interactively optimizing information retrieval systems as a dueling bandits problem. In Proc. of ICML (2009).
[32]
Zhai, C., and Lafferty, J. A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to information retrieval. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22, 2 (Apr. 2004), 179--214.
[33]
Zhang, B., and Seo, Y. Personalized web-document filtering using reinforcement learning. Applied Artificial Intelligence 15 (2001), 665--685.
[34]
Zhang, Y., Xu, W., and Callan, J. Exploration and exploitation in adaptive filtering based on bayesian active learning. In Proc. of ICML (2003), 896--903.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Mobile User Interface Adaptation Based on Usability Reward Model and Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti80400268:4(26)Online publication date: 24-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Unexplored Frontiers: A Review of Empirical Studies of Exploratory SearchACM SIGIR Forum10.1145/3687273.368727858:1(1-19)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2024
  • (2023)A Bayesian Approach for Quantifying Data Scarcity when Modeling Human Behavior via Inverse Reinforcement LearningACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/355138830:1(1-27)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Directing exploratory search: reinforcement learning from user interactions with keywords

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IUI '13: Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
    March 2013
    470 pages
    ISBN:9781450319652
    DOI:10.1145/2449396
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 19 March 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. adaptive interfaces
    2. data mining
    3. information filtering
    4. machine learning
    5. recommender systems

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    IUI '13
    Sponsor:
    IUI '13: 18th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
    March 19 - 22, 2013
    California, Santa Monica, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    IUI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 43 of 192 submissions, 22%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 746 of 2,811 submissions, 27%

    Upcoming Conference

    IUI '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)46
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Mobile User Interface Adaptation Based on Usability Reward Model and Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti80400268:4(26)Online publication date: 24-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Unexplored Frontiers: A Review of Empirical Studies of Exploratory SearchACM SIGIR Forum10.1145/3687273.368727858:1(1-19)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2024
    • (2023)A Bayesian Approach for Quantifying Data Scarcity when Modeling Human Behavior via Inverse Reinforcement LearningACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/355138830:1(1-27)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Envisioning and Understanding Orientations to Introspective AI: Exploring a Design Space with Meta.AwareProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581336(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)A Design Space for Surfacing Content Recommendations in Visual Analytic PlatformsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2022.320944529:1(84-94)Online publication date: Jan-2023
    • (2023)AMED: Aggregated multimedia exploratory and discovery search softwareSoftwareX10.1016/j.softx.2023.10131221(101312)Online publication date: Feb-2023
    • (2023)AI in Education, Learner Control, and Human-AI CollaborationInternational Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education10.1007/s40593-023-00356-z34:1(122-135)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2023
    • (2022)Learning to Ask: Conversational Product Search via Representation LearningACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/355537141:2(1-27)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2022
    • (2021)Comprehensive Review and Future Research Directions on Dynamic Faceted SearchApplied Sciences10.3390/app1117811311:17(8113)Online publication date: 31-Aug-2021
    • (2021)Connecting Students with Research Advisors Through User-Controlled RecommendationProceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3460231.3478879(745-748)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media