[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/199688.199790acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

A cognitive-based approach to introductory computer science courses: lesson learned

Published: 15 March 1995 Publication History

Abstract

A project has been undertaken this past year using a cognitive based approach to implement the Computing I and II courses as defined in Implementation D of Computing Curricula 1991. The salient features of this project include: (i) strategic sequencing and associated levels of mastery of key topics based on Bloom levels; (ii) a spiral approach to presentation; (iii) integral use of structured closed labs; (iv) frequent feedback and (v) early use of teams. This project has led to a series of course documents that explicitly define and schedule course micro-objectives, that map each micro-objective to a specific Bloom knowledge level, and that help to achieve and measure those objectives.

References

[1]
Ken Abernathy, "Some Suggestions for Implementing Closed Laboratories in CSI", Proceedings of the 28~ Southeast Regional Conference, April, 1990, Greenville, South Carolina, pp. 73-79.
[2]
Ken Abernathy, Tom AUen, John MacGregor, "Two Efforts to Incorporate Structured Laboratories into the CS Curriculum", Proceedings of the 29th Southeast Regional Conference, April 1991, Auburn, Alabama, pp. 130-133.
[3]
Computing Curricula 1991 - Report of the ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force.
[4]
Niv Atihuv and Seev Neumann, Princioles of Info~an'on Systems for Management, 3/d edition, William C. Brown, Dubuque Iowa, 1989.
[5]
Doug Baldwin and J.A.G.M. Koomen, "Using Scientific Experiments in Early Computer Science Laboratories", Proceedings of the 23rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Vol. 24, No. 1, March 1992, Kansas City, Missouri, pp. 102-106.
[6]
Benjamin S. Bloom et al, The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of the Educational Goals. Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. McKay Press, New York 1956.
[7]
Paul Chance, "Master of Mastery", Psychology Today, April 1987, pp. 43-46.
[8]
C. West Churchman, ~ Dell Press, New York, 1968.
[9]
M. Doran, H. E. Longenecker Jr. and J. H. Pardue, "A Systems Approach to a Data Structures Course for Information Systems Students Consistent With DPMA IS'90, ISECON'94, October 28-30, 1994, Louisville, KY, pp. 236-243.
[10]
Robert M. Gagnt, The Conditions of Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1985.
[11]
Robert M. Gagnt, Leslie J. Briggs and Walter W. Wager, Princioles of Instructional Desijzn, Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York 1988.
[12]
D. Joyce, "A Virtual Lab to Accompany CS 1 and CS2", 2ptSIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, February 1990, Washington DC, pp. 40- 43.
[13]
Elliot P. Koffman, Phillip L. Miller, and Caroline E. Wardle, "Recommended Curriculum for CS 1, 1984: A Report of the ACM Curriculum Task Force for CS 1", Communications of the ACM, Vol 27, No. 10, pp. 998-1001, October 1984.
[14]
Elliot P. Koffman, David Stemple, and Caroline E. Wardle, "Recommended Curriculum for CS2, 1984: A Report of the ACM Curriculum Task Force for CS2", Communications of the A CM, Vol. 28, No. 8, pp. 815-818, August 1985.
[15]
S. Kim MacGregor, "Computer Programming Instruction: Effects of Collaboration and Structured Design Mile Posts", Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 1988, pp. 155-164.
[16]
J. Merrienboer, "Relationship Between Cognitive Learning Style and Achievement in an Introductory Computer Programming Course", Journal of Research on Computing in Education, Winter 1988, pp. 181 - 186.
[17]
S. Messer, "Reflective-Impulsivity: A Review", Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 83, No. 6, pp. 1026 - 1052.
[18]
Undergraduate Science, Mathematics and Engineering Education, NSF Task Committee on Undergraduate Science and Engineering Education, H. A. Neal (chair), NSF, March 1986.
[19]
Report on the National Science Foundation Disciplinary Workshops on Undergraduate Education, Directorate of Science and Engineering Education, NSF, 1989.
[20]
Report of the National Science Foundation Workshop on the Dissemination and Transfer of Innovation in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education, Dr. Richard D. Breslin (chair), Directorate for Education and Human Resources, NSF, May 1990.
[21]
J. H. Pardue, M, V. Doran and H. E. Longenecker, "A Methodology For Group Learning In The Computer Science Environment", 29~ Annual Southeast Regional ACM Conference, April 1991, pp. 341-343.
[22]
M. Doran, J. H. Pardue and H. E. Longenecker Jr., "Student Perception of Benefits of a Structured CS1 and CS2 Lab Environment", The Journal of Computer and Information Systems, Summer 1994 issue, Vol. XXXIV, No. 4, pp. 40 - 43.
[23]
Rita Riehey, The Theoretical and Conceotua! Bases of Instructional Design, Nichols Publishing, New York 1986.
[24]
David F. Salisbury, "What Should Instructional Designers Know About General Systems Theory?", Educational Technology, August 1989, pp. 42- 45.
[25]
Robert Slavin, "Cooperative Learning", Review of Educational Research, Vol. 50, No. 2, Summer 1980, pp. 313-342.
[26]
Elliot Soloway, "Learning to Program = Learning to Construct Mechanisms and Explanations", Communications of the ACM, Vol. 29, No. 9, pp. 850-858, September 1986.
[27]
Noreen M. Webb, "Group Composition, Group Interaction and Achievement in Cooperative Small Groups", journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 4, 1982 pp. 457-484.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Importance and Implications of Theory of Bloom's Taxonomy in Different Fields of EducationProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Intelligent Systems10.1007/978-3-031-20429-6_47(515-525)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2022
  • (2019)Educational Model for Improving Programming Skills Based on Conceptual Microlearning FrameworkThe Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_85(923-934)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2019
  • (2007)Developing a computer science-specific learning taxonomyWorking group reports on ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education10.1145/1345443.1345438(152-170)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2007
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCSE '95: Proceedings of the twenty-sixth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
March 1995
436 pages
ISBN:089791693X
DOI:10.1145/199688
  • Chairman:
  • Cary Laxer,
  • Editors:
  • Curt M. White,
  • James E. Miller,
  • Judy Gersting
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 March 1995

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

SIGCSE95
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE TS 2025
The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
February 26 - March 1, 2025
Pittsburgh , PA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)43
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Importance and Implications of Theory of Bloom's Taxonomy in Different Fields of EducationProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Intelligent Systems10.1007/978-3-031-20429-6_47(515-525)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2022
  • (2019)Educational Model for Improving Programming Skills Based on Conceptual Microlearning FrameworkThe Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_85(923-934)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2019
  • (2007)Developing a computer science-specific learning taxonomyWorking group reports on ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education10.1145/1345443.1345438(152-170)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2007
  • (2007)Developing a computer science-specific learning taxonomyACM SIGCSE Bulletin10.1145/1345375.134543839:4(152-170)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2007
  • (2006)Developing collaborative skills early in the CS curriculum in a laboratory environmentACM SIGCSE Bulletin10.1145/1124706.112138738:1(138-142)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2006
  • (2006)Developing collaborative skills early in the CS curriculum in a laboratory environmentProceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education10.1145/1121341.1121387(138-142)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2006
  • (2006)Implementing CS1 with embedded instructional research design in laboratoriesIEEE Transactions on Education10.1109/TE.2005.86343549:1(157-165)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2006
  • (2005)Affective objectives in a programming languages courseProceedings of the 43rd annual ACM Southeast Conference - Volume 110.1145/1167350.1167441(319-323)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2005
  • (2005)Analyzing relationships between closed labs and course activities in CS1ACM SIGCSE Bulletin10.1145/1151954.106749737:3(183-187)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2005
  • (2005)Analyzing relationships between closed labs and course activities in CS1Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education10.1145/1067445.1067497(183-187)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2005
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media