[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1007352.1007361acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Robust pcps of proximity, shorter pcps and applications to coding

Published: 13 June 2004 Publication History

Abstract

We continue the study of the trade-off between the length of PCP sand their query complexity, establishing the following main results(which refer to proofs of satisfiability of circuits of size n): 1 We present PCPs of length exp(Õ(log log n)2)•n that can be verified by making o(log logn) Boolean queries.For every ε>0, we present PCPs of length exp(logε n)• n that can be verified by making a constant number of Boolean queries. In both cases, false assertions are rejected withconstant probability (which may be set to be arbitrarily close to 1). The multiplicative overhead on the length of the proof, introduced by transforming a proof into a probabilistically checkable one, is just quasi-polylogarithmic in the first case (ofquery complexity o(log logn)), and 2(log n, for any ε>0, in the second case (of constant query complexity). In contrast, previous results required at least 2 √logn overhead in the length, even to get query complexity 2 √log n. Our techniques include the introduction of a new variant of PCPs that we call "Robust PCPs". These new PCPs facilitate proof composition, which is a central ingredient in construction of PCP systems. (A related notion and its composition properties were discovered independently by Dinur and Reingold. ) Our main technical contribution is a construction of a "length-efficient" Robust PCP. While the new construction uses many of the standard techniques in PCPs, it does differ from previous constructions in fundamental ways, and in particular does not use the "parallelization" step of Arora et al. . The alternative approach may be of independent interest. We also obtain analogous quantitative results for locally testable codes. In addition, we introduce a relaxed notion of locally decodable codes,and present such codes mapping k information bits to code words of length κ1+ε, for any ε>0.

References

[1]
Arora, S., Lund, C., Motwani, R., Sudan, M., and Szegedy, M. Proof verification and the hardness of approximation problems. Journal of the ACM 45, 3 (May 1998), 501--555. (Preliminary Version in 33rd FOCS, 1992).]]
[2]
Arora, S., and Safra, S. Probabilistic checking of proofs: A new characterization of NP. Journal of the ACM 45, 1 (Jan. 1998), 70--122. (Preliminary Version in 33rd FOCS, 1992).]]
[3]
Babai, L., Fortnow, L., Levin, L. A., and Szegedy, M. Checking computations in polylogarithmic time. In Proc. 23rd ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (New Orleans, Louisiana, 6-8 May 1991), pp. 21--31.]]
[4]
Bellare, M., Goldreich, O., and Sudan, M. Free bits, PCPs, and nonapproximability-towards tight results. SIAM Journal of Computing 27, 3 (June 1998), 804--915. (Preliminary Version in 36th FOCS, 1995).]]
[5]
Bellare, M., Goldwasser, S., Lund, C., and Russell, A. efficient probabilistically checkable proofs and applications to approximation. In Proc. 25th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (San Diego, California, 16-18 May 1993), pp. 294--304.]]
[6]
Ben-Sasson, E., Goldreich, O., Harsha, P., Sudan, M., and Vadhan, S. Robust PCPs of proximity, Shorter PCPs and Applications to Coding. Technical Report (to be posted in ECCC).]]
[7]
Ben-Sasson, E., Harsha, P., and Raskhodnikova, S. Some 3CNF properties are hard to test. In Proc. 35th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (San Diego, California, 9-11 June 2003), pp. 345--354.]]
[8]
Ben-Sasson, E., Sudan, M., Vadhan, S., and Wigderson, A. Randomness-efficient low degree tests and short PCPs via epsilon-biased sets. In Proc. 35th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (San Diego, California, 9-11 June 2003), pp. 612--621.]]
[9]
Bogdanov, A., Obata, K., and Trevisan, L. A lower bound for testing 3-colorability in bounded-degree graphs. In Proc. 43rd IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Comp. Science (Vancouver, Canada, 16-19 Nov. 2002), pp. 93--102.]]
[10]
Bogdanov, A., and Trevisan, L. Lower bounds for testing bipartiteness in dense graphs. Tech. Rep. TR02-064, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, 2002.]]
[11]
Dinur, I., and Reingold, O. PCP testers: Towards a more combinatorial proof of PCP theorem. (In Preparation), 2003.]]
[12]
Ergün, F., Kumar, R., and Rubinfeld, R. Fast approximate PCPs. In Proc. 31st ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (Atlanta, Georgia, 1-4 May 1999), pp. 41--50.]]
[13]
Feige, U., Goldwasser, S., Lovász, L., Safra, S., and Szegedy, M. Interactive proofs and the hardness of approximating cliques. Journal of the ACM 43, 2 (Mar. 1996), 268--292. (Preliminary version in 32nd FOCS, 1991).]]
[14]
Fortnow, L., Rompel, J., and Sipser, M. On the power of multi-prover interactive protocols. Theoretical Computer Science 134, 2 (Nov. 1994), 545--557. (Preliminary Version in 3rd IEEE Symp. on Structural Complexity, 1988).]]
[15]
Goldreich, O., Goldwasser, S., and Ron, D. Property testing and its connection to learning and approximation. Journal of the ACM 45, 4 (July 1998), 653--750. (Preliminary Version in 37th FOCS, 1996).]]
[16]
Goldreich, O., and Ron, D. Property testing in bounded degree graphs. Algorithmica 32, 2 (Jan. 2002), 302--343. (Preliminary Version in 29th STOC, 1997).]]
[17]
Goldreich, O., and Safra, S. A combinatorial consistency lemma with application to proving the PCP theorem. SIAM Journal of Computing 29, 4 (2000), 1132--1154. (Preliminary Version in RANDOM, 1997).]]
[18]
Goldreich, O., and Sudan, M. Locally testable codes and PCPs of almost linear length. In Proc. 43rd IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Comp. Science (Vancouver, Canada, 16-19 Nov. 2002), pp. 13--22. (See ECC Report TR02-050, 2002).]]
[19]
Guruswami, V., Lewin, D., Sudan, M., and Trevisan, L. A tight characterization of NP with 3-query PCPs. In Proc. 39th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Comp. Science (Palo Alto, California, 8-11 Nov. 1998), pp. 18--27.]]
[20]
Harsha, P., and Sudan, M. Small PCPs with low query complexity. Computational Complexity 9, 3-4 (Dec. 2000), 157--201. (Preliminary Version in 18th STACS, 2001).]]
[21]
Håstad, J. Some optimal inapproximability results. Journal of the ACM 48, 4 (July 2001), 798--859. (Preliminary Version in 29th STOC, 1997).]]
[22]
Katz, J., and Trevisan, L. On the efficiency of local decoding procedures for error-correcting codes. In Proc. 32nd ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (Portland, Oregon, 21-23 May 2000), pp. 80--86.]]
[23]
Lapidot, D., and Shamir, A. Fully parallelized multi prover protocols for NEXP-time (extended abstract). In Proc. 32nd IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Comp. Science (San Juan, Puerto Rico, 1-4 Oct. 1991), pp. 13--18.]]
[24]
Polishchuk, A., and Spielman, D. A. Nearly-linear size holographic proofs. In Proc. 26th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (Montréal, Québec, Canada, 23-25 May 1994), pp. 194--203.]]
[25]
Raz, R. A parallel repetition theorem. SIAM Journal of Computing 27, 3 (June 1998), 763-803. (Preliminary Version in 27th STOC, 1995).]]
[26]
Rubinfeld, R., and Sudan, M. Robust characterizations of polynomials with applications to program testing. SIAM Journal of Computing 25, 2 (Apr. 1996), 252--271. (Preliminary Version in 23rd STOC, 1991 and 3rd SODA, 1992).]]
[27]
Samorodnitsky, A., and Trevisan, L. A PCP characterization of NP with optimal amortized query complexity. In Proc. 32nd ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (Portland, Oregon, 21-23 May 2000), pp. 191--199.]]

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Shielding Probabilistically Checkable Proofs: Zero-Knowledge PCPs from Leakage ResilienceEntropy10.3390/e2407097024:7(970)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2022
  • (2022)Exponential Lower Bounds for Locally Decodable and Correctable Codes for Insertions and Deletions2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS52979.2021.00077(739-750)Online publication date: Feb-2022
  • (2022)Efficient multivariate low-degree tests via interactive oracle proofs of proximity for polynomial codesDesigns, Codes and Cryptography10.1007/s10623-022-01134-z91:3(1111-1151)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
STOC '04: Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
June 2004
660 pages
ISBN:1581138520
DOI:10.1145/1007352
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 June 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. PCP
  2. locally decodable codes
  3. locally testable codes
  4. probabilistically checkable proofs
  5. property testing

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

STOC04
Sponsor:
STOC04: Symposium of Theory of Computing 2004
June 13 - 16, 2004
IL, Chicago, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

Upcoming Conference

STOC '25
57th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2025)
June 23 - 27, 2025
Prague , Czech Republic

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 09 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Shielding Probabilistically Checkable Proofs: Zero-Knowledge PCPs from Leakage ResilienceEntropy10.3390/e2407097024:7(970)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2022
  • (2022)Exponential Lower Bounds for Locally Decodable and Correctable Codes for Insertions and Deletions2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS52979.2021.00077(739-750)Online publication date: Feb-2022
  • (2022)Efficient multivariate low-degree tests via interactive oracle proofs of proximity for polynomial codesDesigns, Codes and Cryptography10.1007/s10623-022-01134-z91:3(1111-1151)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2022
  • (2022)ZK-PCPs from Leakage-Resilient Secret SharingJournal of Cryptology10.1007/s00145-022-09433-335:4Online publication date: 1-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Succinct Non-Interactive Arguments via Linear Interactive ProofsJournal of Cryptology10.1007/s00145-022-09424-435:3Online publication date: 1-Jul-2022
  • (2021)A structural theorem for local algorithms with applications to coding, testing, and privacyProceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms10.5555/3458064.3458164(1651-1665)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2021
  • (2016)Interactive Oracle ProofsProceedings, Part II, of the 14th International Conference on Theory of Cryptography - Volume 998610.1007/978-3-662-53644-5_2(31-60)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2016
  • (2015)Robust Testing of Lifted Codes with Applications to Low-Degree TestingProceedings of the 2015 IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS.2015.56(825-844)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2015
  • (2015)Quasi-Linear Size Zero Knowledge from Linear-Algebraic PCPsTheory of Cryptography10.1007/978-3-662-49099-0_2(33-64)Online publication date: 24-Dec-2015
  • (2013)Guest columnACM SIGACT News10.1145/2491533.249154944:2(47-79)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2013
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media