[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Thursday, September 01, 2022

WAR: quality X quantity

In the 1970s, Tom Seaver led pitchers in WAR on Fangraphs with 64.

In the 2010s, Clayton Kershaw led with 59.  That's just 5 less than Seaver.

Blyleven and Perry were next at 62 and 58 each in the 1970s. Scherzer and Verlander had 54 each in the 2010s.  That's 6 less for pitchers of today than the heavily worked pitchers of yesteryear.

Those numbers are about 10% less in the 2010s. But the top 3 pitchers of today threw 24% fewer innings. That's a 14% differential between WAR and IP.

The next 7 pitchers in the 1970s averaged 47 WAR, while in the 2010s averaged 38. Those numbers are 20% less in the 2010s, even though the pitchers of 2010s threw 34% fewer innings. That's a 14% differential.

Are we giving out too many WAR to top pitchers today (and/or too few to pitchers of the 1970s)?

Let's see what we can learn from Won-Loss records, and we'll focus on the top 10 pitchers in WAR in both eras.

The top 10 in WAR averages these Won-Loss records:

135-73 2010s

169-124 1970s

So, the top SP of the 1970s got 34 more wins... but also 51 more losses. That's a win% of 34/85 or .400. And .400 is slightly above the replacement level.

These top 10 pitchers of the 2010s had 29% fewer decisions, and they had 30% fewer innings. But that doesn't matter. Because what they ended up shedding was (mostly) replacement-level performances.

And in WAR, we give credit, for both quality AND quantity, for the performances above replacement-level.

And that's why Clayton Kershaw can closely match Tom Seaver, being only 5 WAR short, even though he threw 656 fewer innings.

(1) Comments • 2022/09/01 • WAR

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

September 01, 2022
WAR: quality X quantity