[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Friday, June 27, 2014

Splits happen

Love the headline.  I agree with Mushnick's basic point, that the level of splits we see have almost no meaning.  Given the choice between the level of splits we see today, and seeing no splits at all, we'd be better of, decision-making-wise, having no splits.

The reason is because of "over fitting".  What that means is that things that are in fact random are instead given meaning.  The problem is that by giving it meaning, you are then taking action on that, when you would have otherwise taken the OPPOSITE decision. 

You might even do this in real-life.  Say that the best way to get from NYC to LA is to fly there.  But, the week before, there was a plane accident.  Not only that, but it was with the airline you are going to fly on.  You decide "I'm not going to risk it!  I'll take the train!"  But, are airplane accidents more likely to occur based on the proximity of prior accidents?  I have no idea, but until I see evidence to that effect, I'll assume that it's random.  And even if it was NOT random, you'd then have to figure out if that puts the odds of a fatal accident higher by plane than by train.

It happens with stocks as well.  Investors who chase runs and wait for a clear sign they are out of the bottom before jumping in end up making less money than those who buy-and-hold the index.  That's because they think they've figured out the pattern.  When there is no pattern.  Maybe if you are a day trader, and you are focused on the market every second, you might figure out when to get in and get out.  But then transaction fees might be your undoing.

When you give random events meaning, you end up doing the exact opposite of what you should really be doing.  Basically, don't overthink the situation.?

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

June 27, 2014
Splits happen