[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Tuesday, June 03, 2014

Situational Wins, one more time

Studes does a great job of laying out various scenarios for how Situational Wins (WPA/LI) works.

***

The key to understanding the metric is that every PA is equally weighted.  So, whether it's a blowout scenario, or bottom of 9th tied game scenario, THE MEAN AND THE SPREAD are similar.  This is why, as studes astutely notes that the value of the out is the same in basically all scenarios.  (Not entirely true with runner on third and less than 2 outs, but let's leave that aside for us, and for studes to contemplate.)

In essence, the average win value of a negative event is around -.027 wins, and the average win value of a positive event is around +.054 wins.  If you have a league average OBP of .333, you can see how this balances perfectly.  (For the rest of this blog post, I'll use -.025 and +.050, so it makes it easier to do the calculations.)

In a very high leverage situation (say an LI of 5.0), the average win value of a negative event is -.025 x 5 = -.125 and the average win value of a positive event is +.050 x 5 = +.250.  The RELATIONSHIP between the negative and positive win values remains constant.  It has to, because the average value has to be zero (i.e., .667 x whateverNegativeValue + .333 x whateverPositiveValue always equals zero).  The .333 is the OBP and the .667 is 1-OBP.

So, we divide those win values (-.125, +.250) by the LI to get it back onto the normal scale, so that each PA is equally weighted, regardless of high and low leverage.

***

With me so far?  Ok, now that we know how to keep those things in balance, the next step is to try to keep the positive events in balance.  It would help to think in terms of wOBA, but let's not for now.

The average positive event is +.050 wins.  The walk is +.03, the single is +.045, the HR is +.13 wins, etc.  On average.  But when 1-run is needed, the win value of the single goes up, while the win value of the HR goes down.  It also depends on bases and out situations, along with inning and score.  The key though is that they all are CENTRED around +.050 wins. 

In the most extreme scenario, where a walk or HR leads to the same result (walkoff win), ALL positive events will equal +.050 wins.  Exactly the same for every positive event.  And it's going to be double (and reverse the sign) of the win value of the out.  (As long as the OBP is .333.)

***

So, that's what WPA/LI does:

(a) it forces the "range" of the positive and negative events to be the same, regardless of inning, score, base, out, meaning negatives average -.025 and ?positives average +.050.

(b) it forces each positive event to reflect their impact for the particular inning, score, base, out

***

WPA/LI is a metric that really rises above all other metrics in terms of understanding exactly what is happening.  Unfortunately, it's not easy to explain.  Hopefully, studes' terrific piece adds a few more people onto the Situational Wins train.

 

(15) Comments • 2014/06/04 • Run_Win_Expectancy

Latest...

COMMENTS

Feb 07 15:38
Aging Curve - Swing Speed

Feb 06 11:55
Batting Average as a proxy for fun!  Batting Average as a proxy for fun?

Feb 03 20:21
Valuation implication of straying from the .300 win% replacement level

Jan 31 13:35
Breaking into the Sports Industry WITHOUT learning to code

Jan 26 16:27
Statcast: Update to Catcher Framing

Jan 19 15:02
Young players don’t like the MLB pay scale, while veteran stars love it

Jan 14 23:32
Statcast Lab: Distance/Time Model to Catcher Throwing Out Runners

Jan 07 13:54
How can you measure pitch speed by counting frames?

Jan 02 17:43
Run Value with runners on base v bases empty

Dec 28 13:56
Run Values of Pitches: Final v Intermediate

Dec 27 13:56
Hall of Fame voting structure problem

Dec 23 19:24
What does Andre Pallante know about the platoon disadvantage that everyone else does not?

Dec 21 14:02
Run Values by Movement and Arm Angles

Dec 18 20:45
Should a batter have a steeper or flatter swing (part 2)?

Dec 18 16:19
Art and Science of WAR: Deriving the zero-baseline, historically

THREADS

June 03, 2014
Situational Wins, one more time