[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Friday, July 18, 2014

Silliness of reconstructing innings

?Elmer Dressens earned a loss, without being charged an earned run.  Even though he gave up TWO HR.  That's being inconsistent.

How did he manage that?  Well, he got an out, then an E6, and then an out.  According to the rules, the inning "should" have stopped there.  Everything after that is a freebie.  But, why is that second out taken as a given that it would have happened regardless of the E6?  After all, if the runner had made the second out, who knows what that third batter would have done.  Anyway, take it for granted that he would have made the third out.

How about the next 4 batters?  HR, single, HR, out.  What do we do with them?  Well, according to the rules, they don't exist.  Not in this inning, not in a fictitious next inning.  We simply erase them from existence.  Why do we accept that the out after the E6 would have happened anyway, but then we don't accept that HR-1B-HR would have happened anyway?

The "earned" designation and the recreation of innings is perhaps the silliest official scoring rule in all of sports.

Think of "own goals", goals that are scored against your own team.  They count against your goalie. They don't erase it as "unearned".

Just record what actually happened, and not just start pretending that some things get to be recreated in some fictitious world and some don't and then treat all that as some official record. 

Latest...

COMMENTS

Feb 07 15:38
Aging Curve - Swing Speed

Feb 06 11:55
Batting Average as a proxy for fun!  Batting Average as a proxy for fun?

Feb 03 20:21
Valuation implication of straying from the .300 win% replacement level

Jan 31 13:35
Breaking into the Sports Industry WITHOUT learning to code

Jan 26 16:27
Statcast: Update to Catcher Framing

Jan 19 15:02
Young players don’t like the MLB pay scale, while veteran stars love it

Jan 14 23:32
Statcast Lab: Distance/Time Model to Catcher Throwing Out Runners

Jan 07 13:54
How can you measure pitch speed by counting frames?

Jan 02 17:43
Run Value with runners on base v bases empty

Dec 28 13:56
Run Values of Pitches: Final v Intermediate

Dec 27 13:56
Hall of Fame voting structure problem

Dec 23 19:24
What does Andre Pallante know about the platoon disadvantage that everyone else does not?

Dec 21 14:02
Run Values by Movement and Arm Angles

Dec 18 20:45
Should a batter have a steeper or flatter swing (part 2)?

Dec 18 16:19
Art and Science of WAR: Deriving the zero-baseline, historically

THREADS

July 18, 2014
Silliness of reconstructing innings