[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Thursday, July 27, 2023

Swing Splits, the two Luis

We will be able to slice and dice the swing data to tell some interesting stories.  To give you some snapshot of the data, we can focus on Luis Arraez and Luis Robert. (Click to embiggen)

It looks overwhelming, but let's break it down.  This has all the swing data we've tracked.  For Arraez, it's 709 swings and for Robert, it's 852.  So, add 20% to the counts for Arraez to make an apple-to-apple comparison.

The first thing to jump out is that the number of no-contact swings (whiffs) is very low for Arraez (42 or pro-rated as 50), while it's 267 for Robert.

The second thing that jumps out to me is that Arraez has a very low swing speed on balls hit into play (68 compared to 81 from Robert), but he squares it up much higher (94% to 82%).  You can also see he chokes up on the bat and/or he has a shorter swing, with the bat head 31 inches from the rotational point, while Robert is at 33.5 (around league average).  You can also see it in the attack direction, where Arraez is +7 degrees, meaning the bat slices the other way, while Robert is -4 degrees, meaning he comes around more.

You will see Arraez has a missing row: he has no swings where he is tied up, while Robert has 8.

Also compare each of their hit-into-play with their strike-fouls: all their own data looks very similar, except for the Squared Up part.  That is to be expected, as there's a reason the ball went foul rather than into play.

All this data will have use for two distinct groups of folks.  The first is the player themselves, so they can appreciate or understand their profile.  While obviously every player knows themselves, they may not know the extent of their profile, nor how much their profile may change year to year, or even how it compares to other batters.  So, as a scouting tool, this data will be tremendous.

The other group is for the fans who like to think in terms of the talent of the player, trying to forecast their performance.  As we get more data in the years to come, we'll be able to compare year to year changes and see how that affects their performance.

The convergence of Scouting and Performance Analysis is well upon us.

(2) Comments • 2023/07/27 • Bat_Tracking

Latest...

COMMENTS

Mar 07 23:52
Iterations of ABS (Automated Ball-Strike)

Feb 19 11:05
Bat-Tracking: Timing Early/Late

Feb 07 15:38
Aging Curve - Swing Speed

Feb 06 11:55
Batting Average as a proxy for fun!  Batting Average as a proxy for fun?

Feb 03 20:21
Valuation implication of straying from the .300 win% replacement level

Jan 31 13:35
Breaking into the Sports Industry WITHOUT learning to code

Jan 26 16:27
Statcast: Update to Catcher Framing

Jan 19 15:02
Young players don’t like the MLB pay scale, while veteran stars love it

Jan 14 23:32
Statcast Lab: Distance/Time Model to Catcher Throwing Out Runners

Jan 07 13:54
How can you measure pitch speed by counting frames?

Jan 02 17:43
Run Value with runners on base v bases empty

Dec 28 13:56
Run Values of Pitches: Final v Intermediate

Dec 27 13:56
Hall of Fame voting structure problem

Dec 23 19:24
What does Andre Pallante know about the platoon disadvantage that everyone else does not?

Dec 21 14:02
Run Values by Movement and Arm Angles

THREADS

July 27, 2023
Swing Splits, the two Luis