[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Friday, April 18, 2014

Super Two Monkey Wrench

R.J. asks for alternatives to the Super Two situation.  The issue is based on the idea that those 22% of players with the most service time in the 2.000 to 2.171 class get arbitration rights, which is very valuable.  We never know what the cutoff is until after the fact.  RJ suggests that the players give up Super Two altogether, but then, they have to get something back for it. 

My suggestion is to follow the NHL model.  In the NHL, you don't count service days, but service years.  And you get a service year once you play more than ten games in a season.  So, that means playing more than 12% of the schedule.  The MLB equivalent would be about 21 days on the roster.  That might cause havoc with the September callups, so you can make it 31 days (or whatever so that being called up with the expanded roster won't give the player enough days to count as a full year).

The key point you are trying to get is the following: the number of players who qualify for arbitration should remain fairly constant before the change and after the change.  If you have that, then you know that you are in balance.  I don't know if my suggestion above gives us that, so some aspiring saberist can look into it.

And maybe instead of 31 days, maybe it's 35 days or 28 days or whatever that gives us that balance.

(You might also put in a safety net to also count service days for those perennial minor-league callups.  If say a player is always getting say 25 day callups each year, and so, after 7 years?, he never gets a year of service, even though he has 175 service days.  So at least keep counting that in these odd cases.)

(4) Comments • 2014/04/19

Latest...

COMMENTS

Feb 19 11:05
Bat-Tracking: Timing Early/Late

Feb 07 15:38
Aging Curve - Swing Speed

Feb 06 11:55
Batting Average as a proxy for fun!  Batting Average as a proxy for fun?

Feb 03 20:21
Valuation implication of straying from the .300 win% replacement level

Jan 31 13:35
Breaking into the Sports Industry WITHOUT learning to code

Jan 26 16:27
Statcast: Update to Catcher Framing

Jan 19 15:02
Young players don’t like the MLB pay scale, while veteran stars love it

Jan 14 23:32
Statcast Lab: Distance/Time Model to Catcher Throwing Out Runners

Jan 07 13:54
How can you measure pitch speed by counting frames?

Jan 02 17:43
Run Value with runners on base v bases empty

Dec 28 13:56
Run Values of Pitches: Final v Intermediate

Dec 27 13:56
Hall of Fame voting structure problem

Dec 23 19:24
What does Andre Pallante know about the platoon disadvantage that everyone else does not?

Dec 21 14:02
Run Values by Movement and Arm Angles

Dec 18 20:45
Should a batter have a steeper or flatter swing (part 2)?

THREADS

April 18, 2014
Super Two Monkey Wrench