[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Friday, May 19, 2023

Statcast: HR in X Parks

We have recently updated the process for the HR in X Parks on Savant.  We have both a Standard version and an Adjusted version.

Previously, both were based on the distance landing with a presumed 45 degree descent angle (which implies a 30 degree launch angle).  This made the math pretty easy, since distance to fence plus fence height is what the batted ball needs to be pass.  And for the most part, since HR are hit around that launch angle, the math worked well enough.

Now, we use the actual trajectory of the batted ball, comparing the position of the ball in 3D, every 1 msec, to the fence it is trying to clear.  So, alot more intensive in the calculation and a little more precise.  We'll check later to do see who wins and loses the most based on the new method compared to the old method.

As for Standard v Adjusted: the Standard method assumes the overlay method, and only looks at the actual fence configuration.  This doesn't work for Coors especially, as Coors has the deepest fence in baseball.  The Standard method would treat Coors as the least HR friendly park, rather than the most.  Obviously, that is nonsensical and is the complete opposite of reality.  That's where the Adjusted method comes in, using the actual park impact by distance.  Coors for example adds about 20 feet to long flyballs, and so, that's what is needed.

If you only use one method, use the Adjusted method.  If you want to use two methods, use the Adjusted method.  If you really understand what you are doing, use the Adjusted method.  Finally, if all else fails, then you can use the Standard method, but only in conjunction with the Adjusted method, and never in isolation.  Never, ever in isolation. Ever.

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

May 19, 2023
Statcast: HR in X Parks