[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Saturday, March 26, 2016

Quirks in the bottom of the 9th

?If you look at win expectancy tables in the bottom of the 9th, you will see some quirks.  Here's a good one.  From 1957-2006, which batting team was more likely to win:

  1. Bases empty, tie-ing run at bat
  2. At least one runner on base, tie-ing run at bat

Now, you would think this is easy: they should either be identical, or the first scenario will generate slightly more wins for the batting team.  With more runners on base, the more bases the defense can get an out.  And with 0 or 1 out, this is true.  

But with two outs, the reverse happens.  With bases empty, the batting team wins 3.5% of the time.  But with at least one runner on base, the batting team wins around 4% of the time.  Even though in both cases, the tie-ing run is at the plate.  What does this mean?  Well,with two outs, the defense should allow all runners on base to automatically score.  Because that will turn a 4% chance of winning for the batting team DOWN to 3.5%.

Now, maybe it's a selection bias, that the team that is down by 1 with bases empty and 2 outs is a worse batting team (or facing a better defense) than the other team.  Or this is random variation. Who knows.

I can tell you that in The Book, which uses a pure probability method, the odds of the batting team winning with bases empty, 2 outs, bottom 9th, and tie-ing run at the plate is 5.2%, while with at least one runner on base, it's roughly the same to slightly less.  That is, the probability method matches our expectations more than reality.  

(8) Comments • 2019/06/03 • Run_Win_Expectancy

Latest...

COMMENTS

Feb 19 11:05
Bat-Tracking: Timing Early/Late

Feb 07 15:38
Aging Curve - Swing Speed

Feb 06 11:55
Batting Average as a proxy for fun!  Batting Average as a proxy for fun?

Feb 03 20:21
Valuation implication of straying from the .300 win% replacement level

Jan 31 13:35
Breaking into the Sports Industry WITHOUT learning to code

Jan 26 16:27
Statcast: Update to Catcher Framing

Jan 19 15:02
Young players don’t like the MLB pay scale, while veteran stars love it

Jan 14 23:32
Statcast Lab: Distance/Time Model to Catcher Throwing Out Runners

Jan 07 13:54
How can you measure pitch speed by counting frames?

Jan 02 17:43
Run Value with runners on base v bases empty

Dec 28 13:56
Run Values of Pitches: Final v Intermediate

Dec 27 13:56
Hall of Fame voting structure problem

Dec 23 19:24
What does Andre Pallante know about the platoon disadvantage that everyone else does not?

Dec 21 14:02
Run Values by Movement and Arm Angles

Dec 18 20:45
Should a batter have a steeper or flatter swing (part 2)?

THREADS

March 26, 2016
Quirks in the bottom of the 9th