[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Friday, January 15, 2016

Pitchouts

?Ben does a terrific job giving us the lowdown on pitchouts.

He shows that when there's no pitchout and the runner tries to steal, the success rate for the runner is 73%.  If we make it +.20 runs for SB and -.45 for CS, that's a run value of +.025 runs.  With the pitchout, the runner is safe only 48% of the time, making it worth -.138 runs.  That's one heckavu great deal.  Except you also are giving the batter an extra ball.

However, what if there is a pitchout and the runner stays put?  Well, in that case, the batter benefits.  Normally, Ben says you'd have .64 strikes and .36 balls.  If we give strikes a run value of -.05 for the batter and balls +.05 runs (I'm assuming you don't throw pitchouts come early in the count), then normally we'd have -.014 runs.  But the pitchout is an automatic +.05 runs or a switch of +.064 runs.

At this point, I'd need some more data.  The pitchout-stealAttempt is -.138 runs for the runner and a fraction of +.064 runs for the batter (because sometimes the runner makes the third out on the pitchout).  For discussion purposes, let's say that works all out to -.09 runs.  The pitchout-nonSBattempt is +.064 runs.  That basically sets the breakeven point at around 40%.  That's how often a manager has to be right that the runner is going.  Which is crazy high.

Of course, you've have to rework all the numbers because you are going to pitchout with more likely runners who are better percentage runners than what we're assuming up there.  Anyway, great job by Ben to bring it out in the open.  And there's some work out there for an aspiring saberist to take the groundwork that's been laid and come up with better numbers. 

(12) Comments • 2016/01/16 • In-game_Strategy

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

January 15, 2016
Pitchouts