[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Thursday, March 04, 2021

Infield Defense OAA, Iteration 2

In our first iteration of Infield Defense OAA (Outs Above Average), we looked at all the fully-tracked plays from a ball and player perspective. Since the metric is based on a time/distance model, what we call the Intercept Model, it required the ball and fielder's paths to cross.  

In this next iteration, we are able to do a little bit more.  We can extend the trajectory of the tracked ball until it crosses paths with a fielder.  This helps us increase the sample, especially on the previous version of the tracking system, where the tracked ball would have been a foot or two short of the fielder's center of mass, and may not have been part of the iteration 1 set.

All in all, with the additional plays, the spread in OAA gets wider by a factor of 1.3 times.  Here's a chart showing the before/after of Infield OAA, for the aggregate of 2017-2020.  As you can see, the top dozen players are unchanged in terms of who the fielders are.  What changes is their ordinal rankings.  Nick Ahmed is number 1 in either version (from +53 to +64 OAA).  Andrelton Simmons and Francisco Lindor swap places between 2nd and 3rd.  Arenado is 4th in either version (+33, +48).  Baez, Russell, Chapman leapfrog each other in 5th through 7th. And so on.  After accounting for the change we’d expect simply by having 30% more plays, 90% of the change in OAA was within 5 outs.  In addition, we were able to get the model to handle the 2016 data, which puts it in line with the 2016 Outfield OAA from Catch Probability.

Since the model itself did not change, but rather simply adding extra plays, then this is what we would have expected.  We still have further enhancements in the works, but those would have even less impact than this iteration.  That impact will be on the periphery, but at the same time, will add even more accuracy.

() Comments

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

March 04, 2021
Infield Defense OAA, Iteration 2