[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Monday, March 10, 2014

Ice Time, by score and time

?Cool look by Tyler, seeing how a goon is used relative to a non-goon.

The best hockey is played when goons are not involved, be it in the Olympics, or the playoffs.  Ideally, we'd like to have some proactive rules in place to limit the use of goons, rather than reactive rules (i.e., penalties).

As you can see by Tyler's chart, late in close games, goons are not used, while in blowouts, they are used.  To the extent that goons are there to protect teammates and send a message, it's unnecessary in blowouts.  So, they are only there like "mopup" relievers are used, to use up ice time, and maybe be a jerk.

Otherwise, there are two ways to naturally keep the ice time of goons down even further.  One is to have more 4-on-4.  Goons just aren't used in 4-on-4.  Since close games in the third period already acts as a natural deterrent to using goons, we meed to limit their use in the earlier part of the game.  Imagine therefore that we go to 4-on-4 for the entire 1st period (regular season only *).  What would happen?  Would goons go away?

(*) Not playoffs.  Regular season only.  For PP/PK, it becomes 5-on-4.

The other option is that the amount of time spent in the box is compared to the amount of time spent on the ice.  I don't remember what the goon ratio is.  It's probably about 3:1 ice to box time (that is, if he spends 9 minutes on the ice, he might spend 3 in the box).  Someone out there can check that out.  We don't need players like that.  I don't know what a better ratio is, but somewhere between 5:1 to 10:1.  Two minutes per game, while playing 14 minutes?  That might be the line.  Someone out there can check that out.

So, we're being proactive here, in tackling the goon issue by not changing behaviour, but usage.  For whatever reason, the NHL doesn't want to have a very visible rule in place to deter goon behaviour.  But, change the incentive system for using goons, and teams will organically make the choice for the NHL.

 

(8) Comments • 2014/03/11 • Hockey

Latest...

COMMENTS

Feb 07 15:38
Aging Curve - Swing Speed

Feb 06 11:55
Batting Average as a proxy for fun!  Batting Average as a proxy for fun?

Feb 03 20:21
Valuation implication of straying from the .300 win% replacement level

Jan 31 13:35
Breaking into the Sports Industry WITHOUT learning to code

Jan 26 16:27
Statcast: Update to Catcher Framing

Jan 19 15:02
Young players don’t like the MLB pay scale, while veteran stars love it

Jan 14 23:32
Statcast Lab: Distance/Time Model to Catcher Throwing Out Runners

Jan 07 13:54
How can you measure pitch speed by counting frames?

Jan 02 17:43
Run Value with runners on base v bases empty

Dec 28 13:56
Run Values of Pitches: Final v Intermediate

Dec 27 13:56
Hall of Fame voting structure problem

Dec 23 19:24
What does Andre Pallante know about the platoon disadvantage that everyone else does not?

Dec 21 14:02
Run Values by Movement and Arm Angles

Dec 18 20:45
Should a batter have a steeper or flatter swing (part 2)?

Dec 18 16:19
Art and Science of WAR: Deriving the zero-baseline, historically

THREADS

March 10, 2014
Ice Time, by score and time