[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Thursday, December 19, 2013

How easy is it to make 1000$?

All you have to do is read the article that Poz has linked to.  You make up complete nonsense about a topic you know nothing about, like this:

But Sabermetrics has its flaws. One of them, for evaluation purposes regarding the Hall, is not accounting enough for statistics era to era. A 3.00 ERA in 1968 didn’t mean nearly as much as a 3.00 ERA in 1995, for example.

Sabermetrics is ENTIRELY about this!  This goes back to Pete Palmer's The Hidden Game some thirty years ago, as well as all of the Bill James Abstracts.

I had a quote in The Book, right there on the first page of the first chapter:

Everything about baseball (for that matter, everything about anything) is about context. All actions, events, data, and information are meaningless without context. And we don't mean meaningless in some theoretical sense, but in an actual, practical sense. Consider these words that you are reading right now. The primary context is the English language. You can expand that context to include the subject matter, baseball. Without understanding English and baseball, the words on this page and throughout the book would be gibberish to the reader.

To suggest that sabermetrics doesn't consider the era of a player is to simply admit that you know zero about sabermetrics.  Actually, less than zero, because a person who knows zero would offer no opinion on the matter of sabermetrics.  This writer says the exact opposite of what sabermetrics is.  It does everything he wants it to do, and he's still against it. He'd make a wonderful politician, and by that, I mean, a typical clueless politician. How does an editor even allow such a piece to be posted?

Anyway, Poz has the nice takedown, if you want to read that first.?

(3) Comments • 2013/12/19 • Media

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

December 19, 2013
How easy is it to make 1000$?