[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Saturday, January 17, 2015

How do I respond to this guy?

?I received an email, which I will post in its entirety (including the lack of introductions, etc):

Every single weight you have seems arbitrary to me.  Where is the proof?

(0.72xNIBB + 0.75xHBP + 0.90x1B + 0.92xRBOE + 1.24x2B + 1.56x3B + 1.95xHR) / PA

Do you have some regression test of all the data in baseball that revealed these weights to a 95% statistical significance?  What is the dependent variable?  Runs Scored?  After every year, would these weights not change after running the test?  

Running a regression test isn't complicated.  It's first year undergrad engineering stuff.  Why people accept your weights as doctrine with zero statistical evidence is astonishing.

Soooooo.....  where do I begin?  He obviously did not read The Book, where I go into detail as to how this was developed.  And he obviously did not look at the excerpt on The Book site.  He did not google wOBA, as the first link brings you to this Fangraphs page which lists the wOBA weights year by year going back to 1871.

Instead.... he made up non-facts and treated them as facts (aka strawman).  Then used those non-facts as arguments to form his opinion.  In the end, we have a summary opinion with no evidence, which is the definition of bullsh!t.  And there's no reason to argue with bullsh!t, which is why I instead took advantage of his bullsh!t email to at least show a few links about wOBA to those who may not be aware.

(10) Comments • 2015/01/20 • Linear_Weights

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

January 17, 2015
How do I respond to this guy?