[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Monday, May 06, 2013

Free-for-all batting order

A reader on Bill's site suggested:

the manager is free to send hitters out in any sequence he wishes, so long as all nine players bat before any one player gets an additional turn. In other words, the scoreboard could feature an indifferently ordered list of nine names that'd be scratched through one-by-one until they were all gone, at which point the scratches would vanish and the skipper would be again free to bat whomever in whatever new order... None on, two outs? Send the pitcher up in the first inning... Man on third, two outs? You could bat your star or save him for a hopefully more lucrative chance down the road?

I remember Patriot offering this alternative, but only for the DH, that you can use him at will, as long as he doesn't bat more often than anyone else has at that point.  Everyone else remains fixed in order.  You may actually WANT to put say Pujols at DH and not 1B, figuring that taking a chance of being able to leverage Pujols for 3 PA, maybe 4, is better than guaranteeing 4, maybe 5 PA, and his glove on the field. 

I love this kinds of ideas.  It's really the closer-usage conundrum the manager faces, holding back your better player for an opportunity that may never come.   You're hoping for a base/out Leverage Index (LI) of say 1.6 or 2.1, and instead you are getting 1.2 and 1.4, so you wait, until all that's left at the end is to use him with an LI of 0.7.

Note: if you don't like this party, don't poke your head in to tell us so. We get it, you prefer inertial reasoning which you will wrap with your tradtionalista flag.  If you can join the party, and make it more fun, feel free to comment.

(18) Comments • 2013/05/09 • In-game_Strategy

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

May 06, 2013
Free-for-all batting order