[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Friday, April 05, 2013

Federal League 1914-15

?Rather than asking "was the Federal League a major league", like Neyer asks, I prefer simply knowing: "what percentage of the time was a major-league quality batter at the plate", and similarly for major-league quality pitcher on the mound, and you can extend further for players on the field.

Even today in MLB 2013, that number is not 100% for players at bat, because of pitchers-as-batters.  I think answering my question opens up the doors for further usage.  The WHA featured rookie Wayne Gretzky and old-timers Bobby Hull and Gordie Howe.  But it also featured Slapshot's Jeff Carlson.  The USFL had Herschel and Steve Young, but I'm sure plenty of other players never to come close to the NFL.  This opens up the door to then establishing the quality of the Japan league, AAA, AA, even college ball.  Jeff Zimmerman for example went from the draft to a MLB field in two months.  I would therefore qualify him as a top-level talent in his last year of college.  Of course, that doesn't preclude Harper and Stras from being considered top-level talent, any more than if Steve Young never had the chance to take over in SF.

Anyway: percentage of players considered top-level talent.  It's a harder question, but a more useful answer.  Of course, there are are those who think the question is TOO hard to answer.  What counts is not the ultimate answer necessarily, but the process to take that can possibly lead to an answer.  That's the fun part.

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

April 05, 2013
Federal League 1914-15