[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Saturday, December 06, 2014

Corsi v Tango: Soccer Version

?A Straight Arrow reader pointed me to this post from Mark Taylor who has a soccer blog.  While he did not (initially) run it like I did, I asked him:

Because you are correlating to the seasonal differential, you are, as you stated, not doing exactly the same thing. As a result, as you approach the end of season, you are in effect correlating x to itself.

Could you repeat the same exercise I did, but correlating current data to future data? So, first two games, to next 36 games. First three games to next 35 games, and so on? Presumably, you'll reach a peak when you correlate 18 to 18 games. And it would be interesting to see the pattern for the various shot results.

And he came through, at least with the split-half correlation:

Splitting the season in half, the goal difference in the first half of the season has a r of 0.72 to goal difference in second half.

If you include shot differential for shots that were saved and shots that missed the target, r between these inputs and future goal differential increases to 0.78.

Goal Difference in 2nd half of season=0.46*GD first half+0.021*wide shots differential first half +0.137*saved shots differential first half.

Just to be clear, in my terms which I put relative to goals, that would be:

  • 1.00 Goal Differential
  • 0.30 Save Differential
  • 0.05 Wide Differential

Which... well... is in the ballpark of what we see in NHL.  And in his case, it was only 18-game to 18-game correlations, and ALREADY the goal differential was able to shine through.

(1) Comments • 2014/12/10 • Hockey Soccer

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

December 06, 2014
Corsi v Tango: Soccer Version