[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Saturday, January 01, 2022

CoreWAR: Zero-point

When you win as many as you lose, your win differential is 0.  When you score as many runs as you allow, your run differential is 0.  Zero, in this case, however does not mean “no value”.  Zero means average.

However, there is a math problem with zero = average.  And that is this: the more you play, then you will maintain zero.  Being average at 60 PA or 600 PA is still average.  Being average at 20 IP or 200 IP is still average.  Having a 1-1 record or an 11-11 record is both a win differential of zero, or average.  But in terms of VALUE, 11-11 has far more value than 1-1.  Quantity matters when you are .500.

But at some point below average, quantity does not matter.  But how much below average?  We've established it's around the .300 win%.  So what does this mean?  This means that whether you have 60 PA or 600 PA, being a .300 win% makes no difference, you have the same value.  And that value is zero.  So, unlike above, where a zero run or zero win differential means average, in our case, we literally mean zero meaning no-value.

This zero-point is what we call the replacement level.  Now, while I say that the .300 win% is the zero-point, that is not set in stone.  You can determine the zero-point replacement level however you think it should be.  And it does not even have to be a static level.  You can determine a dynamic level that hovers around your historical level.

For nonpitchers, I set the historical replacement level at 77% of league runs scored and 101% of league runs allowed.  For pitchers, I set it at 122% of league average runs allowed (with a further split between SP and RP of roughly 130% and 108% respectively).  There is flexibility as to where you personally can set it, but generally speaking, you'll land somewhere close to these figures.

Ultimately, because the replacement level is set such that zero = no-value, then wins above the replacement level defines value.  And that value is paid proportionately (above the minimum).

(2) Comments • 2022/01/10 • WAR

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

January 01, 2022
CoreWAR: Zero-point