[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Saturday, January 01, 2022

CoreWAR: Zero-point

When you win as many as you lose, your win differential is 0.  When you score as many runs as you allow, your run differential is 0.  Zero, in this case, however does not mean “no value”.  Zero means average.

However, there is a math problem with zero = average.  And that is this: the more you play, then you will maintain zero.  Being average at 60 PA or 600 PA is still average.  Being average at 20 IP or 200 IP is still average.  Having a 1-1 record or an 11-11 record is both a win differential of zero, or average.  But in terms of VALUE, 11-11 has far more value than 1-1.  Quantity matters when you are .500.

But at some point below average, quantity does not matter.  But how much below average?  We've established it's around the .300 win%.  So what does this mean?  This means that whether you have 60 PA or 600 PA, being a .300 win% makes no difference, you have the same value.  And that value is zero.  So, unlike above, where a zero run or zero win differential means average, in our case, we literally mean zero meaning no-value.

This zero-point is what we call the replacement level.  Now, while I say that the .300 win% is the zero-point, that is not set in stone.  You can determine the zero-point replacement level however you think it should be.  And it does not even have to be a static level.  You can determine a dynamic level that hovers around your historical level.

For nonpitchers, I set the historical replacement level at 77% of league runs scored and 101% of league runs allowed.  For pitchers, I set it at 122% of league average runs allowed (with a further split between SP and RP of roughly 130% and 108% respectively).  There is flexibility as to where you personally can set it, but generally speaking, you'll land somewhere close to these figures.

Ultimately, because the replacement level is set such that zero = no-value, then wins above the replacement level defines value.  And that value is paid proportionately (above the minimum).

(2) Comments • 2022/01/10 • WAR

Latest...

COMMENTS

Mar 07 23:52
Iterations of ABS (Automated Ball-Strike)

Feb 19 11:05
Bat-Tracking: Timing Early/Late

Feb 07 15:38
Aging Curve - Swing Speed

Feb 06 11:55
Batting Average as a proxy for fun!  Batting Average as a proxy for fun?

Feb 03 20:21
Valuation implication of straying from the .300 win% replacement level

Jan 31 13:35
Breaking into the Sports Industry WITHOUT learning to code

Jan 26 16:27
Statcast: Update to Catcher Framing

Jan 19 15:02
Young players don’t like the MLB pay scale, while veteran stars love it

Jan 14 23:32
Statcast Lab: Distance/Time Model to Catcher Throwing Out Runners

Jan 07 13:54
How can you measure pitch speed by counting frames?

Jan 02 17:43
Run Value with runners on base v bases empty

Dec 28 13:56
Run Values of Pitches: Final v Intermediate

Dec 27 13:56
Hall of Fame voting structure problem

Dec 23 19:24
What does Andre Pallante know about the platoon disadvantage that everyone else does not?

Dec 21 14:02
Run Values by Movement and Arm Angles

THREADS

January 01, 2022
CoreWAR: Zero-point