[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Monday, May 06, 2013

Captain Rule in the NHL

Hockey has alot of little things that I like.  One of them is that there's a team captain (and two alternative captain), designated as such with a C or A on their jersey.  The NHL rule:

Only the Captain, when invited to do so by the Referee, shall have the privilege of discussing any point relating to the interpretation of rules. Any Captain, Alternate Captain or any player who comes off the bench and makes any protest or intervention with the officials for any purpose shall be assessed a minor penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct under Rule 40 – Abuse of Officials. Should this protest continue, he may be assessed a misconduct penalty, and if it further continues, a game misconduct penalty shall be warranted.

A complaint about a penalty is NOT a matter “relating to the interpretation of the rules” and a minor penalty shall be imposed against any Captain, Alternate Captain or any other player making such a complaint.

Basically, in hockey, the referee is like a parent, and the players are like children.  It's enough that the ref tells the player what to do, that the player has to do it, and, the ref does not require that he justify himself with the player.  Because of that, the ref won't engage the player, and the player won't bother engaging the ref, because he knows the ref won't bother to explain himself anyway.  There's something to be said for those kinds of bright lines.

In practice, a captain or alternate will ask the ref, and the ref will be cordial enough to just give a matter-of-fact response.  He definitely will never argue with the player.  He'll skate away, and the player will then just keep quiet.  There's a certain level of respect both ways, because both sides know how issues get discussed and resolved.

There's even less discussion with the officials in the NFL, probably because of the clock, it's a big field, lots of players, etc.  It doesn't allow for that.

Not sure about NBA.  I'm sure someone can chime in for that.

Baseball?  You guys will have to provide all the commentary there.

 

?

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

May 06, 2013
Captain Rule in the NHL