Sunday, September 07, 2014
Can you have too much agreement?
?These 4 voters (who I think are NHL.com writers) ranked NHL D from 1 to 13 (it was actually 1 to 14, but let's just focus on their top 13 picks).
The total population of those 13 D came from... 14 players. 14. That's really silly, and points to four people simply looking at D in a very similar way. I would think that of the 13, all 4 would agree on say 8 or 9 (it was actually 12). I'd think maybe you'd have a population of 17 to 19 D from which to select the top 13, if you have 4 voters.
It was only on the 14th D where you had uniqueness of opinion.
Recent comments
Older comments
Page 1 of 151 pages 1 2 3 > Last ›Complete Archive – By Category
Complete Archive – By Date
FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 MarcelsApr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref
Apr 12 09:43 What if baseball was like survivor? You are eliminated ...
Nov 24 09:57 Win Attribution to offense, pitching, and fielding at the game level (prototype method)
Jul 13 10:20 How to watch great past games without spoilers