[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

<< Back to main

Monday, October 04, 2021

Cy Young Predictor 2021

​In my review of 2020, I closed off ominously:

Overall, the model gets a B- I think. I think the fans get a similar grade.

This is probably as bad as it should get. If 2021 gives us something similar, then it’s time to retire this model. I’m going to assume the 60-game season is the cause, but it could very well be a behaviour change. Let’s see how it goes.

And NL 2021 is the test. After a neck and neck race in September, Walker Buehler came out to lead the NL in Cy Young points. As a reminder, the model is ridiculously straightforward:

Cy Young Points = IP/2 - ER + SO/10 + W

I know it looks TOO straightforward, making the concept ridiculous. How is it possible to distill the 30 voters for each award down to such a simple rule? But then again, this is how well it looks going back to 2006:

Every single Cy Young winner finished 1st or 2nd in Cy Young points, since 2006, without exception. None. And even those who finished 2nd were within striking distance (4 points) of 1st place.

So the rule is straightforward enough: if you lead the league in Cy Young points, or are within 4 points of the leader, you are the only candidates to win the Cy Young. This is true for the 30 awards from 2006-2020.  30 for 30.

2021 is going to be the test. Buehler is ahead of 2nd+3rd place Scherzer and Wheeler by 4.6-4.7 points. So, that’s more than the 4 points above. And maybe the model needs to increase its uncertainty level to 5 points. Doing that, then I can at least plausibly say that any one of Scherzer, Wheeler, and Buehler winning is a feather in the cap for the model. But Corbin Burnes has a chance to win the Cy Young, and he’s 11 points behind Buehler. If this was any season before 2021, Burnes would have no shot. But the odds makers have Burnes even with Scherzer (and Buehler nowhere to be found).

The Fans on a Twitter poll have it this way:

  • 1/2: Scherzer/Burnes (too close to call)
  • 3/4: Wheeler/Buehler (too close to call)
  • 5: Woodruff
  • 6/7: Gausman/Urias (too close to call)
  • 8: Wainwright

So, are the fans and the bettors more in tune with the psyche of the voters in 2021? Is it time to retire the model? We’ll see in about six weeks. Until then, here are the forecasts:

NL

  1. Buehler
  2. Wheeler (though really splitting hairs with Max, which I should not mention because…)
  3. Scherzer
  4. Burnes (...really splitting hairs with Gausman, and basically points to the idea that we need to rethink the model)
  5. Gausman
  6. Urias
  7. Woodruff
  8. Wainwright

AL

  1. Ray
  2. Cole
  3. Rodon (only 132 IP!)
  4. Lynn
  5. Montas
  6. McCullers
  7. Berrios
  8. Bassitt


<< Back to main