[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Sunday, September 21, 2014

Negative Runs Created

?There's a thread here asking about negative wRC+ and wRC. 

The point that is missing is the context of runs. You can have 9 guys that are all league average, and this team will score 4.5 runs, which is 0.5 runs created per player. You can replace one guy with a pitcher-as-batter, and keep the other 8 guys the same. This team will score 4.0 runs. Since the 8 guys were each worth 0.5 runs created when the 9th player was someone like them, we reason that they are STILL worth 0.5 runs when a pitcher-as-batter is in their midst.

And if the 8 guys are worth 0.5 runs created, that makes them worth 4 runs. Since the team of them plus the pitcher-as-batter scored 4 runs, we deduce the pitcher-as-batter created 0 runs... even though he did actually get on base, and score runs, and drove in runners.

And if you had Ben Sheets batting, this team would score 3.9 or 3.8 runs, and so, he'd deliver "negative" runs.

***

And this is the hard part: if you had 9 Ben Sheets batting, they would certainly score more than 0 runs, and certainly not negative runs.

So, you really have to establish the ASSUMPTIONS for the stat. One set of assumptions leads to Sheets being negative runs. Another leaders to Sheets being positive.

And one set of assumptions will lower the RC of the OTHER batters depending on who is their teammate, while the other assumption tries to maintain independence.

Choose your poison, but don't tell the other person that he's wrong. You aren't arguing results, but rather reasonableness of assumption

(8) Comments • 2014/09/22 • Linear_Weights

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

September 21, 2014
Negative Runs Created