[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Thursday, April 24, 2014

Negative Losses

When I was still in Montreal, I created a won-loss system for hockey players.  I was kind of proud of it.  The way it works was this: you have 20 players, the average? team wins 40 games, and so, the average player would be worth 2 wins (and 2 losses).  That would mean the average player would have 4 "games".  So, the perfect player would be 4-0, as a team of such players would win 80 and lose 0.  The problem I quickly came across was when I tried to do it with Wayne Gretzky.  I'd have Gretzky as worth some 5 to 10 wins above average.  But my system wouldn't allow any player to exist beyond being 2 wins above average.

Then I figured that since Gretzky played twice as often as the average forward, his "space" is not 4 games, but 8 games.  That still though left me to cap him off at 4 wins above average (8-0 record).  So, I abandoned the idea of a cap, and simply allowed him to be worth 12 W and -4 L. 

I then thought maybe I could add 4W and 4L on his record, to make him 16-0.  That took care of the negative losses, but now I made his "space" 16 games rather than 8.  And I'd have to remove 4W and 4L from the rest of his team.  I wasn't necessarily against the idea, but the whole thing started to lose its lustre for me.

Anyway, I sent someone a link to the Willie Mays page, so you can see the Gretzky issue in a baseball context and for a whole career.  He noted that it's hard to wrap your head around negative losses, and I agree.  I sell the idea on the basis that Mays and Gretzky were so good that they negated some of the losses of their teammates. 

So, according to The Indis, Willie Mays has 210 W and -27 L (that's negative 27).  In Bill James notation, that's a 210+27 record (rather than 210 - -27). But, if I add an equal number of W and L in those negative seasons, his career record is 244 W and 7 L (a 244-7 record).

Presentation-wise, understanding-wise, what makes more sense to you?

(4) Comments • 2017/10/25 • Linear_Weights

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

April 24, 2014
Negative Losses