[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Thursday, March 20, 2014

Mandating pitcher headgear?

?Someone will bring it up, after Chapman

And it doesn't make sense to have that as a rule.  Why?  Because each person has the right to protect himself as he sees fit, as long as it doesn't impact someone else.  For example, there is a cost to the rest of us when someone drives without a seatbelt.  Those people use a disproportionate share of common services (police, highways, hospitals) that we all paid into.  In effect, the rest of us seatbelt-wearers are subsidizing the risk of the seatbelt-less driver.  Our taxes are in essence our insurance premiums.

And insurance is THE way to affect behaviour.  When the NHL mandated helmets, I can only imagine the true reason: the insurance company would otherwise offer them a higher premium if they didn't.  And NOTHING affects a person's behaviour more than being told that he has to pay more for his risky behaviour.

So, if the insurance company is going to start charging a higher premium to MLB, but will offer a "safe pitching discount" to pitchers who put on protective headgear, then that'll be the first step.  Administratively, no one wants everyone to have the option, so it'll be either league-wide mandated, or not.

As it stands, if you are losing one career a year due to lack of protection, that might be, say, a 20MM$ lifetime earnings payout, which spead across 1000 players is 20,000$ per player.  That's how much more the premiums are due to lack of protective headgear for pitchers (in this totally made up illustration).

That's what you have to work out.  You have to figure out at what point it'll hurt the players in the pocketbook before you try to save their heads.  You may not like it, but that's how players (and people) behave.

(3) Comments • 2014/03/21 • MLB_Management

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

March 20, 2014
Mandating pitcher headgear?