Does vocational education pay off in China? Instrumental-variable quantile-regression evidence
Li Dai and
Pedro Martins
No 495, GLO Discussion Paper Series from Global Labor Organization (GLO)
Abstract:
As China's firms upgrade their position in the quality ladder, vocational education may become more important. In this paper, we study returns to secondary vocational education in China paying attention to individual heterogeneity. We use instrumental variables based on geographical and longitudinal changes in enrolment to address the selection between the two types of education. We find that vocational education provides a wage premium vis-à-vis academic education of over 30% but which applies only for individuals at the middle of the conditional wage distribution.
Keywords: Human capital; vocational education; quantile treatment effects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C36 I25 I26 J24 J31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cna, nep-lma and nep-tra
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/214871/1/GLO-DP-0495.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Does vocational education pay off in China? Instrumental-variable quantile-regression evidence (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:glodps:495
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in GLO Discussion Paper Series from Global Labor Organization (GLO) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().