Envy and positional bias in the evolutionary psychology of management

Sarah E. Hill and David M. Buss
Additional contact information
Sarah E. Hill: University of Texas, Austin, USA, Postal: University of Texas, Austin, USA
David M. Buss: University of Texas, Austin, USA, Postal: University of Texas, Austin, USA

Managerial and Decision Economics, 2006, vol. 27, issue 2-3, 131-143

Abstract: We propose that humans have evolved at least two specialized cognitive adaptations shaped by selection to solve problems associated with resource competition: (1) a positional bias by which individuals judge success in domains that affect fitness in terms of standing relative to their reference group; and (2) envy, an emotion that functions to alert individuals to fitness-relevant advantages enjoyed by rivals and to motivate individuals to acquire those same advantages. We present new data supporting the existence of design features of these hypothesized psychological adaptations and discuss implications for economists, organizations, marketers, and managers. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/mde.1288 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:27:y:2006:i:2-3:p:131-143

DOI: 10.1002/mde.1288

Access Statistics for this article

Managerial and Decision Economics is currently edited by Antony Dnes

More articles in Managerial and Decision Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().