Heterogeneity of Beliefs and Information Rigidity in the Crude Oil Market: Evidence from Survey Data

No 50, Chemnitz Economic Papers from Department of Economics, Chemnitz University of Technology

Abstract: This paper assesses information contained in the micro dataset of the ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters regarding quarterly Brent crude oil price forecasts. We examine the expectations building mechanism by referring to the processing of information and confirm the presence of information rigidity within the crude oil market. However, our findings also show that simple models of imperfect information considered in the literature are insufficient to explain the behavior of professional forecasters. We provide additional stylized facts which are helpful for designing more elaborate imperfect information models

Keywords: Crude oil; Disagreement; Expectations; Heterogeneity; Information rigidity; Survey data (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D83 D84 E44 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 47 pages
Date: 2021-09, Revised 2021-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene and nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Chemnitz Economic Papers, September 2021, pages 1-47

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.tu-chemnitz.de/wirtschaft/vwl1/RePEc/d ... er/CEP050_Czudaj.pdf First version, 2021 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Heterogeneity of beliefs and information rigidity in the crude oil market: Evidence from survey data (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tch:wpaper:cep050

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Chemnitz Economic Papers from Department of Economics, Chemnitz University of Technology Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christian Kulitza ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).