Does it Matter that we do not Agree on the Definition of Poverty? A Comparison of Four Approaches

Caterina Ruggeri Laderchi, Ruhi Saith and Frances Stewart

Oxford Development Studies, 2003, vol. 31, issue 3, 243-274

Abstract: While there is world-wide agreement on poverty reduction as an overriding goal of development policy, there is little agreement on the definition of poverty. Four approaches to the definition and measurement of poverty are reviewed in this paper: the monetary, capability, social exclusion and participatory approaches. The theoretical underpinnings of the various measures and problems of operationalizing them are pointed out. It is argued that each is a construction of reality, involving numerous judgements, which are often not transparent. The different methods have different implications for policy, and also, to the extent that they point to different people as being poor, for targeting. Empirical work in Peru and India shows that there is significant lack of overlap between the methods with, for example, nearly half the population identified as in poverty according to monetary poverty but not in capability poverty, and conversely. This confirms similar findings elsewhere. Hence, the definition of poverty does matter for poverty eradication strategies.

Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (140)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1360081032000111698 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Does it matter that we don't agree on the definition of poverty? A comparison of four approaches
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:31:y:2003:i:3:p:243-274

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CODS20

DOI: 10.1080/1360081032000111698

Access Statistics for this article

Oxford Development Studies is currently edited by Jo Boyce and Frances Stewart

More articles in Oxford Development Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().