Rationality of Belief Or Why Bayesianism is neither necessary nor sufficient for rationality

Itzhak Gilboa, Andrew Postlewaite and David Schmeidler

PIER Working Paper Archive from Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania

Abstract: Economic theory reduces the concept of rationality to internal consistency. The practice of economics, however, distinguishes between rational and irrational beliefs. There is therefore an interest in a theory of rational beliefs, and of the process by which beliefs are generated and justified. We argue that the Bayesian approach is unsatisfactory for this purpose, for several reasons. First, the Bayesian approach begins with a prior, and models only a very limited form of learning, namely, Bayesian updating. Thus, it is inherently incapable of describing the formation of prior beliefs. Second, there are many situations in which there is not sufficient information for an individual to generate a Bayesian prior. Third, this lack of information is even more acute when we address the beliefs that can be attributed to a society. We hold that one needs to explore other approaches to the representation of information and of beliefs, which may be helpful in describing the formation of Bayesian as well as non-Bayesian beliefs.

Keywords: Decision making; Bayesian; Behavioral Economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 21 pages
Date: 2004-03-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-evo, nep-hpe and nep-mic
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://economics.sas.upenn.edu/sites/default/file ... ng-papers/04-011.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Rationality of Belief Or: Why Savage's axioms are neither necessary nor sufficient for rationality, Second Version (2007)
Working Paper: Rationality of Belief. Or: Why Bayesianism is Neither Necessary nor Sufficient for Rationality (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pen:papers:04-011

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in PIER Working Paper Archive from Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania 133 South 36th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Administrator ().