Peer Punishment in Teams: Emotional or Strategic Choice?

Marco Casari and Luigi Luini

Purdue University Economics Working Papers from Purdue University, Department of Economics

Abstract: Punishing the free-riders of a team can promote group efficiency but is costly for the punisher. For this reason, economists see punishment as a second-order public good. We show in an experiment that subjects do not value punishment for its deterrence but instead for the satisfaction of retaliating. Punishment choices are made with little strategic reasoning.

Keywords: experiments; public goods; informal punishment; emotions; legal systems (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 C92 D23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 37 pages
Date: 2006-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec, nep-cbe, nep-evo, nep-exp and nep-soc
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://business.purdue.edu/research/Working-papers-series/2006/1188.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pur:prukra:1188

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Purdue University Economics Working Papers from Purdue University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Business PHD ().