[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
  EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Financial Market Equilibrium with Bounded Awareness 1

Ani Guerdjikova () and John Quiggin
Additional contact information
Ani Guerdjikova: GAEL - Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: We consider an infinite-horizon economy with differential awareness in the form of coarsening. Agents with limited awareness are averse to unfavorable surprises. As a result their optimal trades are measurable w.r.t. their respective awareness partitions. We define an equilibrium with differential awareness and illustrate how the obtained equilibrium allocations observationally differ from those in economies with full awareness. In particular, economies with differential awareness can exhibit (i) lack of insurance against idiosyncratic risk; (ii) partial insurance against aggregate risk; (iii) biased state prices even when beliefs are correct and (iv) overpricing of assets which pay on events with low aggregate payoffs. We next adapt the results of Guerdjikova and Quiggin (2019) to show that agents with different levels of awareness can survive and influence prices in the limit. In this sense, the characteristics identified above would persist in the long-run. Moreover, differential awareness can lead to belief heterogeneity even in the limit. This is in contrast with the classical result of Blume and Easley (2006) stating that only agents with beliefs closest to the truth can survive. Finally, we examine the individual welfare implications of bounded awareness. If an increase in awareness comes at the cost of wrong beliefs over the larger state-space, bounded awareness can simultaneously increase individual welfare (with respect to the truth) and help avoid ruin. In this sense, heuristics which constrain agents to invest in "assets they understand" can be both ecologically rational in the sense of Gigerenzer (2007) and improve the stability of financial markets by allowing a larger set of agents to survive.

Keywords: Ambiguity; Ambiguity-aversion; Survival (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-01-30
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-upt
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03962427v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-03962427v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Financial market equilibrium with bounded awareness (2020) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03962427

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2024-12-28
Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03962427