[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
  EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Delayed Participation of Developing Countries to Climate Agreements: Should Action in the EU and US be Postponed?

Valentina Bosetti, Carlo Carraro () and Massimo Tavoni ()

No 2008.70, Working Papers from Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei

Abstract: This paper analyses the cost implications for climate policy in developed countries if developing countries are unwilling to adopt measures to reduce their own GHG emissions. First, we assume that a 450 CO2 (550 CO2e) ppmv stabilisation target is to be achieved and that Non Annex1 (NA1) countries decide to delay their GHG emission reductions by 30 years. What would be the cost difference between this scenario and a case in which both developed and developing countries start reducing their emissions at the same time? Then, we look at a scenario in which the timing of developing countries’ participation is uncertain and again we compute the costs of climate policy in developed and developing countries. We find that delayed participation of NA1 countries has a negative impact on climate policy costs. Economic inefficiencies can be as large as 10-25 TlnUSD. However, this additional cost wanes when developing countries are allowed to trade emission reductions from their baseline emission paths during the 30-year delay period. Thus, irrespective of whether NA1 countries are immediately assigned an emission reduction target or not, they should nonetheless be included in a global carbon market. Technology deployment is also affected by the timing of developing countries’ mitigation measures. Delayed NA1-country participation in a climate agreement would scale down the deployment of coal with CCS throughout the century. On the other hand, innovation in the form of energy R&D investments would be positively affected, since it would become crucial in developed countries. Finally, uncertainty about the timing of NA1-country participation does not modify the optimal abatement strategy for developed countries and does not alter policy costs as long as a global carbon market is in place.

Keywords: Delayed Action; Climate Policy; Stabilisation Costs; Uncertain Participation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 H23 Q25 Q28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-env and nep-gth
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
https://feem-media.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/w ... oads/NDL2008-070.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Delayed Participation of Developing Countries to Climate Agreements: Should Action in the EU and US be Postponed? (2008) Downloads
Working Paper: Delayed Participation of Developing Countries to Climate Agreements: Should Action in the EU and US be Postponed? (2008) Downloads
Working Paper: Delayed Participation of Developing Countries to Climate Agreements: Should Action in the EU and US be Postponed? (2008) Downloads
Working Paper: Delayed Participation of Developing Countries to Climate Agreements: Should Action in the EU and US be Postponed? (2008) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fem:femwpa:2008.70

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alberto Prina Cerai ().

 
Page updated 2024-06-08
Handle: RePEc:fem:femwpa:2008.70