Trade Theory and Trade Facts
Raphael Bergoeing and
Timothy Kehoe
No 109, Documentos de Trabajo from Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile
Abstract:
This paper quantitatively tests the "new trade theory" based on product differen-tiation, increasing returns, and imperfect competition. We employ a standard model, which allows both changes in the distribution of income among industrialized coun-tries, emphasized by Helpman and Krugman (1985), and nonhomothetic preferences, emphasized by Markusen (1986), to effect trade directions and volumes. In addition, we generalize the model to allow changes in relative prices to have large effects. We test the model by calibrating it to 1990 data and then "backcasting" to 1961 to see what changes in crucial variables between 1961 and 1990 are predicted by the theory. The results show that, although the model is capable of explaining much of the increased concentration of trade among industrialized countries, it is not capable of explaining the enormous increase in the ratio of trade to income. Our analysis suggests that it is policy changes, rather than the elements emphasized in the new trade theory, that have been the most significant determinants of the increase in trade volume.
Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (35)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cea-uchile.cl/wp-content/uploads/doctrab/ASOCFILE120030327171309.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Trade theory and trade facts (2001)
Working Paper: Trade Theory and Trade Facts
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:edj:ceauch:109
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Documentos de Trabajo from Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().