Valuing Public Goods: The Life Satisfaction Approach
Bruno Frey,
Simon Luechinger and
Alois Stutzer
CREMA Working Paper Series from Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA)
Abstract:
This paper discusses a novel approach to elicit people?s preferences for public goods, namely the life satisfaction approach. Reported subjective well-being data are used to directly evaluate utility consequences of public goods. The strengths of this approach are compared to traditional approaches and identification issues are addressed. Moreover, it is applied to estimate utility losses caused by terrorist activities in France, the UK and the Republic of Ireland. Terrorism in these countries depresses life satisfaction in a sizeable and robust way. However, the calculation of the trade-off between terrorism and income requires improved measurement of the marginal utility of income.
Keywords: life satisfaction approach; non-market valuation; cost-benefit analysis; subjective well-being; and terrorism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D61 D74 H41 H56 I31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (82)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.crema-research.ch/papers/2004-11.pdf Full Text (application/pdf)
https://www.crema-research.ch/abstracts/2004-11.htm Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
Working Paper: Valuing Public Goods: The Life Satisfaction Approach (2004)
Working Paper: Valuing Public Goods: The Life Satisfaction Approach
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cra:wpaper:2004-11
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CREMA Working Paper Series from Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anna-Lea Werlen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).