[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
  EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

American Idol: Should it be a Singing Contest or a Popularity Contest?

J. Atsu Amegashie

No 2171, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: In the very popular FOX TV reality show, American Idol, the judges, who are presumably experts in evaluating singing effort, have no voting power when the field is narrowed to the top twenty-four contestants. It is only the votes of viewers that count. In the 2007 season of the show, one of the judges, Simon Cowell, threatened to quit the show if a contestant, Sanjaya Malakar, who was clearly a low-ability contestant, won the competition. He was concerned that the show was becoming a popularity contest instead of a singing contest. Is this a problem? Not necessarily. I show that, under certain conditions, making success in the contest dependent on a contestant’s popularity and not solely on her singing ability or performance, could paradoxically increase aggregate singing effort. It may be optimal to give the entire voting power to the viewers whose evaluation of singing effort or ability is noisier.

Keywords: American Idol; contests; tournaments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp2171.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: American Idol: should it be a singing contest or a popularity contest? (2009) Downloads
Journal Article: American Idol: should it be a singing contest or a popularity contest? (2007) Downloads
Working Paper: American Idol: Should it be a Singing Contest or a Popularity Contest? (2007) Downloads
Working Paper: American Idol: Should it be a Singing Contest or a Popularity Contest? (2007) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_2171

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().

 
Page updated 2024-12-06
Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_2171