Purchasing Power Parity and the Taylor Rule

No auwp2011-02, Auburn Economics Working Paper Series from Department of Economics, Auburn University

Abstract: In the Kehoe and Midrigan (2007) model, the persistence parameter of the real exchange rate is closely related to the measure of price stickiness in the Calvo-pricing model. When we employ this view, Rogoff's (1996) 3 to 5 year consensus half-life implies that firms update their prices every 18 to 30 quarters on average. This is at odds with most estimates from U.S. aggregate data when single equation methods are applied to the New Keynesian Phillips Curve (NKPC), or when system methods are applied to Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) models that include the NKPC. It is well known, however, that there is a large degree of uncertainty around the consensus half-life of the real exchange rate. To obtain a more efficient estimator, this paper develops a system method that combines the Taylor rule and a standard exchange rate model to estimate half-lives. We use a median unbiased estimator for the system method with nonparametric bootstrap confidence intervals, and compare the results with those from the single equation method typically used in the literature. Applying the method to the real exchange rates of 18 developed countries against the U.S. dollar, we find that most of the half-life estimates from the single equation method fall in the range of 3 to 5 years with wide confidence intervals that extend to positive infinity. In contrast, the system method yields median-unbiased estimates that are typically shorter than one year with much sharper 95% confidence intervals, most of which range from 3 quarters to 5 years. These median unbiased estimates and the lower bound of the confidence intervals for the half-lives of real exchange rates are consistent with most estimates of price stickiness using aggregate U.S. data for the NKPC and DSGE models.

Keywords: Purchasing Power Parity; Calvo Pricing; Taylor Rule; Half-Life of PPP Deviations; Median Unbiased Estimator; Grid-t Confidence Interval (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C32 E52 F31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cba, nep-mon and nep-opm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cla.auburn.edu/econwp/Archives/2011/2011-02.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Purchasing Power Parity and the Taylor Rule (2015)
Working Paper: Purchasing power parity and the Taylor rule (2013)
Working Paper: Purchasing Power Parity and the Taylor Rule (2013)
Working Paper: Purchasing Power Parity and the Taylor Rule (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:abn:wpaper:auwp2011-02

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Auburn Economics Working Paper Series from Department of Economics, Auburn University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Hyeongwoo Kim ().