TAXATION AND LABOUR SUPPLY

Patricia Apps ()

No 560, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University

Abstract: Cross country comparisons of lifecycle labour supplies show that female hours of market work are significantly lower in Australia than in other comparable OECD countries, notably, the US, UK and Sweden. This paper argues that an explanation can be found in the rate structure of the Australian family income tax system, in combination with a poorly developed and costly childcare sector. A detailed analysis of marginal and average tax rates shows how various policy instruments are used to set rates on the income of a second earner, typically the female partner, that reduce her net wage to a level that makes it difficult to finance childcare from the additional income. The system is also shown to be unfair. The paper proposes a return to a progressive individual income tax, with universal family benefits, together with the development of a high quality, education oriented, public sector childcare system.

Keywords: Income Taxes; Time Allocation; Labor Supply; Life Cycle Choices (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D91 H24 J22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab and nep-pub
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cbe.anu.edu.au/researchpapers/CEPR/DP560.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:auu:dpaper:560

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().