Deriving Norms from Actions, Values and Context
Pages 2223 - 2225
Abstract
Personal technology such as electronic partners (e-partners) play an increasing role in our daily lives, and can make an important difference by supporting us in various ways. However, when they offer this support, it is important that they do so with an understanding of our choices and what is important to us. To allow an e-partner to flexibly do this, we propose a formal framework to automatically derive norms which describe how to perform a certain behavior. These norms are directly derived from the user's actions, values and the context they are in. In this way, the e-partner can take into account the user's values and offer more flexible personalized support.
References
[1]
2017. Ethically Aligned Design - A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems, Version 2. The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/
[2]
Jan Balata, Zdenek Mikovec, and Pavel Slavik. 2018. Landmark-enhanced route itineraries for navigation of blind pedestrians in urban environment. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 12, 3 (01 Sep 2018), 181--198.
[3]
Tina Balke, Celia da Costa Pereira, Frank Dignum, Emiliano Lorini, Antonino Rotolo, Wamberto Vasconcelos, and Serena Villata. 2013. Normative Multi-Agent Systems. Schloss Dagstuhl.
[4]
N. Criado, E. Argente, P. Noriega, and V. Botti. 2013. Human-inspired model for norm compliance decision making. Information Sciences 245 (2013), 218--239.
[5]
L. González-Delgado, L. Serpa-Andrade, K. Calle-Urgiléz, A. Guzhñay-Lucero, V. Robles-Bykbaev, and M. Mena-Salcedo. 2016. A low-cost wearable support system for visually disabled people. In 2016 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing (ROPEC). 1--5.
[6]
Eleonora Milic, Dragan Jankovic, and Aleksandar Milenkovic. 2018. Health Care Domain Mobile Reminder for Taking Prescribed Medications. In ICT Innovations 2016, Georgi Stojanov and Andrea Kulakov (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 173--181.
[7]
Temiloluwa Prioleau, Elliot Moore II, and Maysam Ghovanloo. 2017. Unobtrusive and Wearable Systems for Automatic Dietary Monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 64 (2017), 2075--2089.
[8]
J.S. Santos, J.O. Zahn, E.A. Silvestre, V.T. Silva, and W.W. Vasconcelos. 2017. Detection and resolution of normative conflicts in multi-agent systems: a literature survey. Journal of Autonomous Agent Multi-Agent Systems 31 (2017), 1236--1282.
[9]
John Thangarajah, Lin Padgham, and Michael Winikoff. 2003. Detecting & Exploiting Positive Goal Interaction in Intelligent Agents. In Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems, AAMAS.
[10]
M.L. Tielman, C.M. Jonker, and M.B. van Riemsdijk. 2018. What should I do? Deriving norms from actions, values and context. In International Workshop Modelling and Reasoning in Context (MRC), Held at FAIM. Under revision at the AAMAS/IJCAI Workshop on Modeling and Reasoning in Context.
[11]
Ibo van de Poel. 2013. Translating Values into Design Requirements. Springer, Chapter Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process.
[12]
M. Birna van Riemsdijk, Mehdi Dastani, Frank Dignum, and John-Jules Meyer. 2004. Dynamics of Declarative Goals in Agent Programming. In International Workshop on Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies.
[13]
M. Birna van Riemsdijk, Catholijn M. Jonker, and Victor Lesser. 2015. Creating Socially Adaptive Electronic Partners. In International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
[14]
Wenxin Wang, Céline L. van Lint, Willem-Paul Brinkman, Ton J. M. Rövekamp, Sandra van Dijk, Paul J. M. van der Boog, and Mark A. Neerincx. 2017. Renal transplant patient acceptance of a self-management support system. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 17, 1 (08 May 2017), 58.
[15]
Yunlong Wang, Lingdan Wu, Jan-Philipp Lange, Ahmed Fadhil, and Harald Reiterer. 2018. Persuasive technology in reducing prolonged sedentary behavior at work: A systematic review. Smart Health 7--8 (2018), 19 -- 30.
Index Terms
- Deriving Norms from Actions, Values and Context
Recommendations
Does a Conversational Robot Need to Have its own Values?: A Study of Dialogue Strategy to Enhance People's Motivation to Use Autonomous Conversational Robots
HAI '16: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent InteractionThis work studies a dialogue strategy aimed at building people's motivation for talking with autonomous conversational robots. Even though spoken dialogue systems continue to develop rapidly, the existing systems are insufficient for continuous use ...
Axies: Identifying and Evaluating Context-Specific Values
AAMAS '21: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent SystemsThe pursuit of values drives human behavior and promotes cooperation. Existing research is focused on general (e.g., Schwartz) values that transcend contexts. However, context-specific values are necessary to (1) understand human decisions, and (2) ...
What values should an agent align with?: An empirical comparison of general and context-specific values
AbstractThe pursuit of values drives human behavior and promotes cooperation. Existing research is focused on general values (e.g., Schwartz) that transcend contexts. However, context-specific values are necessary to (1) understand human decisions, and (2)...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
May 2019
2518 pages
ISBN:9781450363099
- General Chairs:
- Edith Elkind,
- Manuela Veloso,
- Program Chairs:
- Noa Agmon,
- Matthew E. Taylor
Sponsors
Publisher
International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
Richland, SC
Publication History
Published: 08 May 2019
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
- Netherlands Organisation for Schientific Research (NWO)
Conference
AAMAS '19
Sponsor:
AAMAS '19: International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
May 13 - 17, 2019
Montreal QC, Canada
Acceptance Rates
AAMAS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 193 of 793 submissions, 24%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 49Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)1
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 14 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in