A simulation model for risk assessment in a smart mobility ecosystem based on the inoperability input-output theory
Authors: 
Justin Moskolai Ngossaha, Raymond Houé Ngouna, Bernard Archimède, Marcel Fouda NdjodoAuthors Info & Claims
Article No.: 31, Pages 1 - 10
Abstract
In our modern society, the vicious circle "urbanization, traffic congestion and lack of security" is choking metropolitan authorities, leading to a declined quality of life, as the demography rises, along with mobility demand. For cities to operate efficiently, urban mobility should be established in a sustainable manner, combining urban planning, mature infrastructures and technological innovation. The mobility landscape is then being reshaped and represents a new constraint in city management, but also innovative opportunities for authorities and business. The design of the mobility ecosystem should then take into account many interdependent systems of which any failure may affect the equilibrium of the whole. This paper proposes a simulation model of the critical infrastructures of the urban mobility, seen as a system of systems. The simulation is based on the inoperability input-output model. The scenario performed allows to analyze different strategies of adjustment in case of external disturbances.
References
[1]
Abbas, K. A., & Bell, M. G. 1994. System dynamics applicability to transportation modeling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 28(5), 373--390.
[2]
Arthur D. Little. 2018. The Future of Mobility 3.0: Reinventing Mobility in the era of disruption and creativity. Report,. http://www.adlittle.com/futuremobilitylab/Banister, D. 2008. The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport policy, 15(2), 73--80.
[3]
Jittrapirom, P., Caiati, V., Feneri, A. M., Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S., González, M. J. A., & Narayan, J. 2017. Mobility as a Service: a critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Planning, 2(2), 13.
[4]
Goodall, W., Dovey, T., Bornstein, J., & Bonthron, B. 2017. The rise of mobility as a service. Deloitte Rev, 20, 112--129.
[5]
Haimes, Y. Y., & Jiang, P. 2001. Leontief-based model of risk in complex interconnected infrastructures. Journal of Infrastructure systems, 7(1), 1--12.
[6]
Haimes, Y. Y., Horowitz, B. M., Lambert, J. H., Santos, J. R., Lian, C., & Crowther, K. G. 2005. Inoperability input-output model for interdependent infrastructure sectors. I: Theory and methodology. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 11(2), 67--79.
[7]
Hietanen, S. (2014). Mobility as a Service. The new transport model, 2--4.
[8]
Jeekel, J. F. 2016. Smart mobility and societal challenges: an implementation perspective. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
[9]
Leontief, W. W. 1966. Input-output economics, Oxford University Press, New York.
[10]
Lian, C., & Haimes, Y. Y. 2006. Managing the risk of terrorism to interdependent infrastructure systems through the dynamic inoperability input-output model. Systems Engineering, 9(3), 241--258.
[11]
Ouyang, M. 2014. Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems. Reliability engineering & System safety, 121, 43--60.
[12]
Pfaffenbichler, P., Emberger, G., & Shepherd, S. 2010. A system dynamics approach to land use transport interaction modelling: the strategic model MARS and its application. System Dynamics Review, 26(3), 262--282.
[13]
Schrank, D., Eisele, B., & Lomax, T. 2012. TTI's 2012 urban mobility report. Texas A&M Transportation Institute. The Texas A&M University System, 4.
[14]
Setola, R., & Theocharidou, M. 2016. Modelling Dependencies Between Critical Infrastructures. In Managing the Complexity of Critical Infrastructures (pp. 19--41). Springer, Cham.
[15]
UN-United Nations. 2014. World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision, highlights. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division, United Nations.
[16]
UN-Habitat. 2013. Planning and design for sustainable urban mobility: Global report on human settlements 2013. Routledge.
[17]
Zmud, J., Ecola, L., Phleps, P., & Feige, I. 2013. The future of mobility. RAND Corporation.
Recommendations
Indicators to measure smart mobility: an indonesian perspective
ICTCE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Telecommunications and Communication EngineeringThe increasing number of urban populations brings various challenges for urban life, one of them is tranportation problem. In Indonesia the problems are really worst in several cities, such as Bandung and Jakarta. Those cities are trying to implement ...
Smart Mobility: Contradictions in Value Co-Creation
AbstractTechnical progress is disrupting the mobility sector. New door-to-door (D2D) mobility integrators promise to offer smart mobility by packaging together different mobility services such as car-sharing and public transport. However, mobility ...
Smart Cities Education as Mobility, Energy & ICT Hub
SMARTGREENS 2016: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT SystemsThe subject of smart cities is highly discussed topic not only in the domain-specific mobility, energy and
ICT circles but also in the educational and research-related fields. The questions are arising along with the
broader acceptance of smart cities ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
July 2018
398 pages
Publisher
Society for Computer Simulation International
San Diego, CA, United States
Publication History
Published: 09 July 2018
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 130Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)48
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in