extended-abstract

Incorporating Observation Error when Modeling Trust between Multiple Robots Sharing a Common Workspace: (Extended Abstract)

Authors:

Shreyasha Paudel,

Christopher M. ClarkAuthors Info & Claims

AAMAS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems

Pages 1351 - 1352

Published: 09 May 2016 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

Most multi-robot systems assume all robots are programmed to cooperate and complete tasks without consideration of dishonest robots seeking to maximize their own benefit. The work presented here develops and analyzes a distributed trust estimation framework that allows robots to estimate the trustworthiness of other robots in the community, and share these estimates to enable cooperative trust estimation. Our previous work has shown that when observation errors were ignored, the trust-estimation error converges to a steady state value over time. We extend this previous work, by now considering the effects of observation error and proving that trust-estimation error converges.

References

[1]

A. Birk and S. Carpin. Merging occupancy grid maps from multiple robots. Proceedings of the IEEE, 94(7):1384--1397, July 2006.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[2]

W. Burgard, M. Moors, C. Stachniss, and F. Schneider. Coordinated multi-robot exploration. Robotics, IEEE Transactions on, 21(3):376--386, June 2005.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

T. D. Huynh, N. R. Jennings, and N. R. Shadbolt. An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 13(2):119--154, 2006.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

K. T. Mantel and C. M. Clark. Trust networks in multi-robot communities. In Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), 2012 IEEE International Conference on, pages 2114--2119. IEEE, 2012.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[5]

Z. Noorian and M. Ulieru. The state of the art in trust and reputation systems: a framework for comparison. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 5(2):97--117, 2010.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

I. Pinyol and J. Sabater-Mir. Computational trust and reputation models for open multi-agent systems: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 40(1):1--25, 2013.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

C. Pippin and H. Christensen. Trust modeling in multi-robot patrolling. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2014), 2014.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[8]

C. E. Pippin, H. Christensen, and L. Weiss. Dynamic, cooperative multi-robot patrolling with a team of uavs. volume 8741, pages 874103-874103-8, 2013.

Google Scholar

[9]

W. L. Teacy, J. Patel, N. R. Jennings, and M. Luck. Travos: Trust and reputation in the context of inaccurate information sources. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 12(2):183--198, 2006.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Index Terms

Incorporating Observation Error when Modeling Trust between Multiple Robots Sharing a Common Workspace: (Extended Abstract)
1. Computer systems organization
  1. Embedded and cyber-physical systems
    1. Robotics
      1. Robotic autonomy

Recommendations

Do Humans Trust Robots that Violate Moral Trust?
The increasing use of robots in social applications requires further research on human-robot trust. The research on human-robot trust needs to go beyond the conventional definition that mainly focuses on how human-robot relations are influenced by robot ...
Would You Trust a (Faulty) Robot?: Effects of Error, Task Type and Personality on Human-Robot Cooperation and Trust
HRI '15: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

How do mistakes made by a robot affect its trustworthiness and acceptance in human-robot collaboration? We investigate how the perception of erroneous robot behavior may influence human interaction choices and the willingness to cooperate with the robot ...
The Null-Space-based Behavioral Control for Mobile Robots with Velocity Actuator Saturations

In this paper we present the application of the Null-Space-based Behavioral (NSB) approach to the motion control of mobile robots with velocity saturated actuators. The NSB is a behavior-based robot control approach ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

AAMAS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems

May 2016

1580 pages

ISBN:9781450342391

General Chairs:
Catholijn M. Jonker
TU Delft, Netherlands
,
Stacy Marsella
University of Southern California, USA
,
Program Chairs:
John Thangarajah
RMIT University. Australia
,
Karl Tuyls
University of Liverpool, UK

In-Cooperation

SIGAI: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

Richland, SC

Publication History

Published: 09 May 2016

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Extended-abstract

Conference

AAMAS '16

Sponsor:

AAMAS '16: International Conference on Agents and Multiagent Systems

May 9 - 13, 2016

Singapore, Singapore

Acceptance Rates

AAMAS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 137 of 550 submissions, 25%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

0
Total Citations
66
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)1
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Index Terms

Recommendations

Do Humans Trust Robots that Violate Moral Trust?

Would You Trust a (Faulty) Robot?: Effects of Error, Task Type and Personality on Human-Robot Cooperation and Trust

The Null-Space-based Behavioral Control for Mobile Robots with Velocity Actuator Saturations