[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.255351acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespervasivehealthConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A new quantitative performance parameter for monitoring robotics rehabilitation treatment

Published: 20 May 2014 Publication History

Abstract

In clinical practice, the great potential of robots in extracting quantitative and meaningful data is not always exploited. The aim of the present paper is to propose a simple parameter that allows to follow the performance of subjects during upper limb robotic training with no additional effort for patients or clinicians. Armeo®Spring has been used to perform a training on 14 children affected by cerebral palsy (CP). Each session was evaluated with the new parameter allowing us to observe variations in subjects' performance over time. A preliminary validation of the parameter was performed by means of Melbourne clinical scale. Further studies are required to compare the results with kinematics data and other clinical scales.

References

[1]
Lo H S, & Xie S Q 2012. Exoskeleton robots for upper-limb rehabilitation: State of the art and future prospects. Med Eng Phys, 34(3), 261--8.
[2]
Fortin C., Ehrmann Feldman D, Cheriet F, & Labelle H. 2011. Clinical methods for quantifying body segment posture: a literature review. Disabil rehabil, 33(5), 367--83
[3]
Fasoli, S E, Krebs H I, Stein J, Frontera W R, et al 2003. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84(4), 477--82.
[4]
Brewer B R, McDowell S K, & Worthen-Chaudhari L C 2007. Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of robotic systems and clinical results Top stroke rehabil, 14(6), 22--44
[5]
Merlo A, Longhi M, Giannotti E, Prati P, et al. 2013. Upper limb evaluation with robotic exoskeleton. Normative values for indices of accuracy, speed and smoothness. NeuroRehabil, 33(4), 523--30.
[6]
Randall M, Carlin J B, Chondros P and Reddihough, D 2001. Reliability of the Melbourne assessment of unilateral upper limb function. Dev Med Child Neurol, 43(11), 761--7
[7]
Krebs H I, Volpe B T, Ferraro M, Fasoli S, et al. 2002. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: from evidence-based to science-based rehabilitation. Top stroke rehabil, 8(4), 54--70

Index Terms

  1. A new quantitative performance parameter for monitoring robotics rehabilitation treatment

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PervasiveHealth '14: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
    May 2014
    459 pages
    ISBN:9781631900112

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering)

    Brussels, Belgium

    Publication History

    Published: 20 May 2014

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. armeo®spring pediatric
    2. cerebral palsy
    3. robotics rehabilitation
    4. upper limb

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    PervasiveHealth '14

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 116 submissions, 47%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 57
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media