[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.255481acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespervasivehealthConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Why traditional usability criteria fall short in ambient assisted living environments

Published: 20 May 2014 Publication History

Abstract

According to ISO 9241, traditional usability definitions focus on pragmatic aspects of technical systems, such as the ease of using a system (effectiveness, efficiency) and the perceived usefulness. While this definition was found to be highly applicable for a wide range of technical systems in the working context, it is a major question if the pragmatic approach is adequate for novel technical developments (e.g., health supporting systems) in the home sector. The integration of medical technology in home environments, such as Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) requests a high willingness of users to accept new forms of medical assistance and to rely on the technology in a very sensitive and intimate field. Also, user diversity is a serious issue, as increasingly more, and especially older users will have to master technical devices in the near future. In order to contribute to a basic acceptance understanding of such medical technologies against the background of user diversity, in this research, along with the traditional usability criteria, additional aspects of system usability are examined. Results show that the sole consideration of ease of use and the perceived usefulness is not sufficient for current designs. Future usability concepts should much more integrate additional aspects like trust in technology, wish for privacy protection, system reliability and fun, especially when designing technology solutions for older users.

References

[1]
Alagöz, F., Ziefle, M., Wilkowska, W. and Calero Valdez, A. 2011. Openness to accept medical technology -- a cultural view. In Information Quality in eHealth, A. Holzinger, K.-M. Simonic, eds. Lect Notes Comput Sc, 7058, Springer, Berlin, 51--170.
[2]
Arning, K., Gaul, S. and Ziefle, M. 2010. Same Same but Different. How Service Contexts of Mobile Technologies Shape Usage Motives and Barriers. In HCI in Work & Learning, Life & Leisure, Leitner et al. eds. Lect Notes Comput Sc, 6389, Springer, Berlin, 34--54.
[3]
Choon, Y.-Y. 2005. Cross-Cultural Issues in Human-Computer Interaction, In: International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, W. Karwowski, Ed. Taylor & Francis, London, 1063--1069.
[4]
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci., 35, 8, 982--1003.
[5]
Gaul, S. and Ziefle, M. 2009. Smart Home Technologies: Insights into Generation-Specific Acceptance Motives. In HCI and Usability for e-Inclusion, A. Holzinger, K. Miesenberger, eds. Lect Notes Comput Sc, 5889, Springer, Berlin, 312--332.
[6]
Hassenzahl, M. 2004. The Thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In Funology. From usability to enjoyment, M. A. Blyhte et al., eds. Kluwer, Norwell, M. A., 31--42.
[7]
Hommelsen, M. 2010. Usability criteria for multitouch interfaces in ehealth. Unpublished Bachelor thesis, RWTH Aachen University, Germany.
[8]
Klack, L., Schmitz-Rode, T., Wilkowska, W., Kasugai, K., Heidrich, F., & Ziefle, M. 2011. Integrated Home Monitoring and Compliance Optimization for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices. Ann Biomed Eng, 39, 12, 2911--2921.
[9]
Kleinberger, T., Becker, M., Ras, E., Holzinger, A. and Muller P. 2007. Ambient Intelligence in Assisted Living: Enable Elderly People to Handle Future Interfaces. Lect Notes Comput Sc, 4555, Springer, Berlin, 103--112.
[10]
Lalou, S. 2008. Identity, Social Status, Privacy and Face-keeping in the Digital Society. Soc Sc Inform, 47, 3, 299--330.
[11]
Leonhardt, S. 2006. Personal Healthcare Devices. In AmIware Hardware Technology Drivers of Ambient Intelligence Mekherjee, S., et al. eds., Springer, Dordrecht, 349--370.
[12]
Seshamani, M and Gray, A. 2004. Time to death and expenditure: an improved model for the impact of demographic change on health care, Age Ageing, 33, 6, 556--561.
[13]
Wilkowska, W. and Ziefle, M. 2011. User diversity as a challenge for the integration of medical technology into future home environments. In Human-Centred Design of eHealth Technologies. Concepts, Methods and Applications, M. Ziefle, C. Röcker, eds. IGI Global, Hershey, P.A, 95--126.
[14]
Wilkowska, W. and Ziefle, M. 2012. Privacy and Data Security in E-health: Requirements from Users' Perspective. Health Informatics J, 18, 3, 191--201.
[15]
Ziefle, M. and Jakobs, E.-M. 2010. New Challenges in Human Computer Interaction: Strategic Directions and Interdisciplinary Trends. 4th International Conference on Competitive Manufacturing Technologies. University Stellenbosch, South Africa, 389--398.
[16]
Ziefle, M., Himmel, S. and Wilkowska, W. 2011. When your Living Space Knows what you do. In Information Quality in eHealth, A. Holzinger, K.-M. Simonic, eds. Lect Notes Comput Sc, 7058, Springer, Berlin, 607--624.
[17]
Ziefle, M. and Schaar, A. K. 2011. Gender differences in acceptance and attitudes towards an invasive medical stent. Electron. J. Health Inform, 6, 2, 1--18.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Are Active and Assisted Living applications addressing the main acceptance concerns of their beneficiaries? Preliminary insights from a scoping reviewProceedings of the 15th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3529190.3534753(414-421)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
PervasiveHealth '14: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
May 2014
459 pages
ISBN:9781631900112

In-Cooperation

Publisher

ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering)

Brussels, Belgium

Publication History

Published: 20 May 2014

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ambient assisted living (AAL)
  2. medical technology
  3. older adults
  4. technology acceptance
  5. usability
  6. user diversity

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

PervasiveHealth '14

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 116 submissions, 47%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 11 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Are Active and Assisted Living applications addressing the main acceptance concerns of their beneficiaries? Preliminary insights from a scoping reviewProceedings of the 15th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3529190.3534753(414-421)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media